In this chapter we address the following question: Does the
direction and/or magnitude of the influence of urban form on travel vary across
different household types? If the answer is `yes', we can suggest the existence of
interaction effects in the impact of urban form. If, on the other hand, the analysis
shows no differences in the impact of urban form, this suggests that household types
display similar responses to urban form, irrespective of their personal situation. In
particular, we investigate differences in the effect of urban form, or residential
context, on trip frequency and travel time across six household types: single workers,
two- and one-worker couples, two- and one-worker families and senior households.
The analysis of travel time is segmented by trip purpose: we differentiate between
commuting times, `maintenance' times (e.g. trips running household errands, moving
goods, shopping, giving lifts to people etc.) and leisure travel times, for several
reasons. First, this broader perspective permits us to obtain better insights into the
impact of urban form on travel patterns than a focus on commuting alone. Second,
the number of both maintenance and leisure trips is larger than that ofcommuting
trips in the Netherlands (Schwanen et al., 2001a). The data used for this analysis is
derived from a nationally representative sample of the Dutch population, and stems
from the 2001 Netherlands National Travel Surve
Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.