Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Software Usability: A Comparison Between Two Tree-Structured Data Transformation Languages

By N. Schmidt and Corina Sas

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a software usability study, involving both subjective and objective evaluation. It compares a popular XML data transformation language (XSLT) and a general purpose rule-based tree manipulation language which addresses some of the XML and XSLT limitations. The benefits of the evaluation study are discussed

Publisher: ACM
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:12408
Provided by: Lancaster E-Prints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). A Common Architecture for Manipulating Tree-Structured Data. PhD thesis.
  2. (1990). A survey on software quality metrics. Abo Akademi Univ.
  3. (2003). Analyzing metadata for effective use and re-use. NSDL Meeting,
  4. (1999). Designing Web Usability: the practice of simplicity. doi
  5. Programming at Python speed: A conversation with Guido van Rossum, part III.
  6. (2001). Python Essential Reference.
  7. (1980). Qualitative software complexity models: A summary.
  8. (2003). Rule-driven processing of tree-structured data using pointed trees. doi
  9. (1986). Software complexity measurement. doi
  10. (1996). SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale.
  11. (1999). Usability of geospatial metadata or space-time matters. doi
  12. (1999). Web Consortium. XML Path Language (XPath) 1.0, W3C Recommendation, doi
  13. (1999). Web Consortium. XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0, W3C Recommendation, doi
  14. Web-based user interface evaluation with questionnaires.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.