Location of Repository

Developing a realistic sexual network model of chlamydia transmission in Britain

By Katherine ME Turner, Elisabeth J Adams, Nigel Gay, Azra C Ghani, Catherine Mercer and W John Edmunds
Topics: Research
Publisher: BioMed Central
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1388195
Provided by: PubMed Central
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.g... (external link)
  • Suggested articles



    1. (2003). A: Opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection. I: acceptability of urine testing in primary and secondary healthcare settings. Sex Transm Infect
    2. (2005). AJT: Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands. Sexually transmitted infections,
    3. (2005). AM: Ethnic variations in sexual behaviour in Great Britain and risk of sexually transmitted infections: a probability survey. Lancet
    4. (2003). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance
    5. (2002). Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group: The chlamydia recall study: investigating the incidence and re-infection rates of genital chlamydial infection among 16-24 year old women attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics,
    6. (2004). Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies. Sex Transm Infect
    7. (2001). Clinical Effectiveness Group, Association of Genitourinary Medicine and the Medical Society for the Study of Venereal Diseases: Clinical Effectiveness Guidelines for the Management of Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Tract Infection.
    8. (2005). Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study. BMJ
    9. (2001). Effect of computer-assisted self-interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviours in a general population sample: a methodological experiment. AIDS
    10. (2006). Erens B: Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent geniLQ y LQ z ap p a ap ap p a ap beh beh =∗
    11. (2004). Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening. Sex Transm Infect
    12. (1991). Genital chlamydial infections: Epidemiology and reproductive sequelae.
    13. (1998). GP: Sampling biases and missing data in explorations of sexual partner networks for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Stat Med
    14. (1997). GP: The Role of Sexual Partnership Networks in the Epidemiology of Gonorrhoea. Sex Transm Dis
    15. (2004). GRASP Steering Group: The Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Programme (GRASP) Year
    16. (2002). Habbema JD: What proportion of episodes of gonorrhoea and chlamydia becomes symptomatic?
    17. (2002). Is the increase in notifications of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Sweden the result of changes in prevalence, sampling frequency or diagnostic methods? Scand J Infect Dis
    18. (2003). MW: Prevalence and determinants of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women from Bogota, Colombia. Sex Transm Infect
    19. (2005). Ness RB: Systematic review: noninvasive testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Ann Intern Med
    20. (2001). Postma MJ: Comparative model-based analysis of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    21. RM: Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control
    22. (1996). Severijnen AJ: Modeling prevention strategies for gonorrhoea and chlamydia using stochastic network simulations.
    23. (2000). Sex Transm Dis
    24. (2001). Sexual behaviour in Britain: partnerships, practices, and HIV risk behaviours. Lancet
    25. (1996). Sexually transmitted diseases and sexual behaviour: insights from mathematical models.
    26. (2000). St Louis ME: Duration of untreated genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis
    27. (2003). TD: Truth and consequences: using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality.
    28. (1993). Telling tails explain the discrepancy in sexual partner reports. Nature
    29. (2004). The correct approach to modelling and evaluating chlamydia screening. Sexually transmitted infections
    30. (2005). The UK Collaborative Group for HIV and STI Surveillance: Mapping the Issues. HIV and other Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United Kingdom:
    31. Therapeutic management.
    32. (1992). TW: Discrepancies between men and women in reporting number of sexual partners: a summary from four countries. Soc Biol
    33. (2004). Udry JR: Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States. JAMA
    34. (1990). W: The significance of sexual partner contact networks for the transmission dynamics of HIV. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr
    35. (1999). WE: Chlamydia trachomatis Infections: Progress and Problems.
    36. (1996). What's in a mean? An examination of the inconsistency between men adn women in reporting sexual partnerships.
    37. (2000). WW: Prostitution and the sex discrepancy in reported number of sexual partners.

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.