Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

E-assessment: its implementation and impact on learning outcomes

By Lily Wong


To remain globally competitive, there is increasing pressure for universities to incorporate a greater use of technology and innovation into their curriculum. In response, many higher education institutions have adopted a blended learning approach, which combines traditional face-to-face delivery with online teaching resources, to deliver course content. At Victoria University this is now policy and all units offered by the university are required to have an online presence by the first semester of 2009. Our first-year core accounting unit is taught in Australia and overseas locations including Hong Kong, Malaysia and Beijing. There are a number of variations of how this blending occurs and the extent to which it is used may be influenced by a number or factors. These include the technical skills and time allocation of the teaching staff, professional IT support, student motivation, internet speed and access, explicit connection to assessment and ease of use for assessment tasks. Some of these issues were addressed when this unit was moved to the online learning platform of WebCT. This paper documents the design and implementation of e-assessment and online resources in this introductory accounting unit and monitors its impact on learning outcomes

Topics: blended learning, e-assessment, innovation, introductory accounting, learning outcomes
Publisher: University of Glamorgan
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Glamorgan Dspace

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). Accounting education‘s uncertain environments: descriptions and implications for accounting programmes and accounting education research, doi
  2. (2000). An investigation into ways of challenging introductory accounting student’s negative perceptions of accounting. doi
  3. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education.
  4. (2001). Assessment for learning: the differing perspectives of tutors and students. doi
  5. (2008). Blended learning in higher education—framework, principles and guidelines. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass—an imprint of Wiley.
  6. (1999). Cultural issues of the internet in classrooms. doi
  7. (2007). Does access to tutorial solutions enhance student performance? Evidence from an accounting course. doi
  8. (2001). Does the method of assessment of a module improve the performance of a student? Assessment and Evaluation doi
  9. (1995). First year on campus—diversity in the initial experience of Australian undergraduates.
  10. (2006). Global perspectives on blended learning.
  11. (2005). Growing by degrees – online education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium,
  12. (2006). Increasing success in first year courses: assessment re-design, self-regulation and learning technologies.
  13. (2008). Integrating a virtual learning environment into a second year accounting course: determinants of overall student perception. doi
  14. (2003). Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: determinants of student motivation. doi
  15. (2004). Motivation and electronic assessment. doi
  16. (2008). Over the worst or at the eye of the storm? Journal of Education and Training (forthcoming) Available online at: Jones N
  17. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. doi
  18. (2005). Strategies for promoting active learning in tutorials: insights gained from a first year accounting subject.
  19. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. doi
  20. (2006). The handbook of blended learning—global perspectives, local designs.
  21. (1993). The introductory accounting courses: educating majors and nonmajors. doi
  22. (2008). The use of online summative assessment in an undergraduate financial accounting course. doi
  23. (2004). Using e-learning dialogues in higher education. doi
  24. (2004). Web usage by first year undergraduate accounting students: the effects of language background and individual differences.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.