Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Supervised classification of microbiota mitigates mislabeling errors.\ud \ud

By Dan Knights, Justin Kuczynski, Omry Koren, Ruth E. Ley, Dawn Field, Rob Knight, Todd Z. DeSantis and Scott T. Kelley

Abstract

The exponential growth of DNA sequencing technologies and concomitant advances in bioinformatics methods are revolutionizing our understanding of diverse microbial communities (Riesenfeld et al., 2004; Tyson et al., 2004; Hugenholtz and Tyson, 2008; Tringe and Hugenholtz, 2008; Caporaso et al., 2010). Large-scale microbial metagenomics studies have particularly exciting applications in the arena of human health, laying the foundation for the Human Microbiome Project (HMP). In the context of the HMP and related efforts, care has been taken to understand the impact of amplification biases or sequencing errors. However, far less attention has been paid to the impact of errors in metadata on biological interpretations and the mitigation of such errors. During processing and pooling of hundreds of samples, some mislabeling is likely. Figure 1 illustrates a real world example: several 16S rRNA amplifications of bacterial community DNA samples collected along a time series were accidentally mislabeled (late switched to early) (Koenig et al., 2010). Automated detection of such errors will be important as datasets become increasingly large and complex.\ud \u

Topics: Data and Information
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1038/ismej.2010.148
OAI identifier: oai:nora.nerc.ac.uk:12862
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.nature.com/ismej/jo... (external link)
  • https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.... (external link)
  • https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.... (external link)
  • http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/epri... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.