We investigated whether the seed banks of\ud ex-arable lowland calcareous grasslands underwent\ud restoration similar to that of the above-ground restoration,\ud andwhether this was influenced by seed-sowing or\ud environmental conditions. We compared 40 sites,\ud where some form of restoration work had been\ud implemented between 2 and 60 years previously, with\ud 40 paired reference sites of good quality calcareous\ud grassland with no history of ploughing or agricultural\ud improvement. We analysed differences between sites\ud and between above- and below-ground vegetation\ud using both a multivariate approach and proportions of\ud selected plant attributes. Seed banks of reference sites\ud were more characteristic of late successional\ud communities, with attributes such as stress tolerance,\ud perenniality and a reliance on fruit as the germinule\ud form more abundant than in restoration sites. In\ud restoration sites, these tended to decrease with restoration\ud site isolation and increase with restoration site age\ud and where soil nutrient conditions were more similar to\ud reference sites (i.e. with relatively low phosphorus and\ud high nitrogen). Seed bank communities of all sites\ud differed considerably from above-ground communities,\ud however, and no overall significant responses to\ud site age, isolation or soil nutrients were detected by\ud multivariate analyses of similarity of species between\ud pairs of sites. Responses to different seeding methods\ud were also barely detectable. While there is some\ud indication from the plant attribute data that the regeneration\ud potential contained in the seed banks of restored\ud sites increasingly resembles that of references sites over\ud time, even seed banks of good quality calcareous\ud grassland are dominated by ruderal species. It is likely,\ud therefore, that permanent seed banks do not facilitate\ud the restoration of ex-arable grasslands
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.