Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Pesticide safety among farmworkers: perceived risk and perceived control as factors reflecting environmental justice.

By Thomas A Arcury, Sara A Quandt and Gregory B Russell

Abstract

Farmworkers in the United States constitute a population at risk for serious environmental and occupational illness and injury as well as health disparities typically associated with poverty. Pesticides are a major source of occupational injury and illness to which farmworkers are exposed. Efforts to provide safety training for farmworkers have not been fully evaluated. Based on the Health Belief Model, this analysis examines how safety information affects perceived pesticide safety risk and control among farmworkers and how perceived risk and control affect farmworker knowledge and safety behavior. Data are based on interviews conducted in 1999 with 293 farmworkers in eastern North Carolina as part of the Preventing Agricultural Chemical Exposure in North Carolina Farmworkers' Project. Perceived pesticide risk and perceived pesticide control scales were developed from interview items. Analysis of the items and scales showed that farmworkers had fairly high levels of perceived risk from pesticides and perceived control of pesticide safety. Receiving information about pesticide safety (e.g., warning signs) reduced perceived risk and increased perceived control. Pesticide exposure knowledge was strongly related to perceived risk. However, perceived risk had a limited relationship to safety knowledge and was not related to safety behavior. Perceived control was not related to pesticide exposure knowledge, but was strongly related to safety knowledge and safety behavior. A key tenet of environmental justice is that communities must have control over their environment. These results argue that for pesticide safety education to be effective, it must address issues of farmworker control in implementing workplace pesticide safety

Topics: Research Article
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1241168
Provided by: PubMed Central

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). A Demographic and Employment Profile of United States Farmworkers.
  2. (1997). A National Dialogue on the Worker Protection Standard. Part 1: Transcripts of the Public Meetings. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
  3. (1997). A Profile of US Farm Workers: Demographics, Household Composition, Income and Use of Services. Based on data from the National Agricultural Workers Survey.
  4. (1999). Agricultural chemical training materials for farmworkers: review and annotated bibliography.
  5. (2000). An Assessment of Worker Training under the Worker Protection Standard. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
  6. (1990). An Atlas of State Profiles Which Estimates Number of Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers and Members of Their Families.
  7. (1999). Balancing risks and resources: applying pesticides without using protective equipment in Southern Mexico. In:
  8. (1993). Cancer among migrant and seasonal farmworkers: an epidemiologic review and research agenda.
  9. (1998). Chronic agricultural chemical exposure among migrant and seasonal farmworkers.
  10. (1993). Chronic exposure to an environmental hazard: risk perceptions and self-protective behavior.
  11. (1999). Enhancing community participation in a public health project: farmworkers and agricultural chemicals in North Carolina. Health Educ Behav
  12. (1993). Environmental equity and pesticide exposure.
  13. (1998). Farmworker and farmer perceptions of farmworker agricultural chemical exposure in North Carolina.
  14. (2001). Farmworker reports of pesticide safety and sanitation in the work environment.
  15. (1991). Fatal work injuries involving farmworkers,
  16. Government Accounting Office,
  17. (1992). Health status and needs of migrant farmworkers in the United States: a literature review.
  18. (1990). Health status of migrant farmworkers: a literature review and commentary.
  19. (1999). Implementation of US-EPA’s Worker Protection Standard training for agricultural laborers: an evaluation using North Carolina data. Public Health Rep
  20. Improvements Needed to Ensure the Safety of Farmworkers and their Children.
  21. (1993). Individual and cultural differences in adaptation to environmental risks.
  22. (1997). Male pesticide exposure and pregnancy outcome.
  23. (1993). Male-mediated developmental toxicity.
  24. (1984). MH: The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q
  25. (1998). Occupational exposure to pesticides and congenital malformations: a review of mechanisms, methods, and results.
  26. (1997). Occupational injury rates among hired farmworkers.
  27. (1994). Peer discussions of cancer among Hispanic migrant farm workers. Pubic Health Rep
  28. (1998). Pesticide exposure and fetal death: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Crit Rev Toxicol
  29. (2001). Pesticide exposure beliefs among Latino farmworkers in North Carolina’s Christmas tree industry.
  30. (1994). Pesticide Industry Sales and Usage:
  31. (1995). Pesticide Use in U.S. Crop Production: National Summary Report.
  32. (1992). Pesticide worker protection standard training 40CFR Part 70. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
  33. (1989). Pesticide-related health problems and farm workers.
  34. (1997). Pesticides and cancer.
  35. (2000). Preventing Agricultural Chemical Exposure: A Safety
  36. (2001). Preventing occupational exposure to pesticides: using participatory research with Latino farmworkers to develop an intervention.
  37. (1996). Prevention and resiliency: a cross cultural view of farmworkers’ and farmers’ beliefs about work safety.
  38. (1994). Protect Yourself from Pesticides—Guide for Agricultural Workers. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
  39. (1993). Susto and pesticide poisoning among Florida farmworkers.
  40. (1999). The occupational health status of hired farm workers.
  41. (1995). The socioeconomic context of exposure and response to environmental risk.
  42. (1980). Work-related fatalities in the agricultural production and services sectors,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.