Article thumbnail

Roll out the big canon: a subjective academic narrative

By Josie Arnold

Abstract

Following a brief survey of creative writing vs literary studies, and looking at both in relationships to social networking sites, in this paper, I consider the ways in which we assume that some personal writing is ‘creative’. In doing so, I question the use of literature as a model for creative writing. At the same time I canvass the necessity for wide reading as a basis for creative writing. I suggest that the subjective self is inadequate as a singular basis for creative writing and that the author is stirring from the deathbed not to attain the position of the ‘god’ but rather to provide leadership in a world obsessed with the subjective self as data. In doing so, I look at some the technology of the present assessing some electronic implications of the death of the author and the birth of the subjective self, at social networking and/as creative writing, and at warnings about the power of the culture industry. Finally, rather plaintively, I call for rolling back out the big canon itself. My theoretical framework of narrativity and the subjective academic narrative is shown as another paradox within this discussion

Topics: Creative writing, E-discourse, Literary studies, Narrativity
Publisher: Asian Economic and Social Socity
Year: 2012
OAI identifier: oai:vtl.cc.swin.edu.au:swin:31057
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://www.aessweb.com/abstrac... (external link)
  • http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/2... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.