Article thumbnail

A cost effectiveness analysis of using alternate materials for non-skid in shipboard applications

By Kurt P. Boenisch, Hector A. Cervantes, Andrew J. Clark, Jesse G. Espe and Erik B. Lohrke


MBA Professional ReportApproved for public release; distribution is unlimited.This MBA project investigated and evaluated the cost effectiveness of using alternative materials in shipboard construction, specifically in the area of non-skid application on surface ships. This project identified the costs and benefits of different alternatives to the currently used non-skid and identified whether these alternatives would be feasible for use onboard Navy ships. The analysis indicates that the Thermion alternative shows the potential for the most significant cost savings across the Surface Fleet, while the Liquidmetal alternative also shows potential for savings compared to the current status quo. It is recommended that both the Thermion and Liquidmetal alternatives be prototyped on Navy warships to better define their costs and benefits and evaluate their suitability for use.Lieutenant(s), United States Nav

Topics: Surfaces (Technology), Skid resistance., Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cost effectiveness Analysis, non-skid, amorphous metal
Publisher: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
Year: 2003
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.