The inclusion of socially irresponsible companies in sustainable stock indices

Abstract

[EN] Social rating agencies implement complex filters to identify the companies with the best sustainable and social performance and help investors select the companies for their sustainable portfolios. This study analysed whether companies that are defined as ethical, sustainable and socially responsible by those agencies actually deserve this label. More specifically, the inclusion in the prestigious Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) World of companies that have been involved in controversies according to the Thomson Reuters Eikon database was studied. The results show that the inclusion of irresponsible companies in the DJSI Index is a fact. This outcome is in line with previous studies that criticise the methodologies applied by social rating agencies and those which outline the similarity of sustainable and conventional portfolios. The results may explain the contradictory conclusions regarding the performance of sustainable and conventional mutual funds in numerous studiesArribas, I.; Espinós-Vañó, MD.; García García, F.; Morales-Bañuelos, PB. (2019). The inclusion of socially irresponsible companies in sustainable stock indices. Sustainability. 11(7):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072047114117OU, Y.-C. (2016). USING A HYBRID DECISION-MAKING MODEL TO EVALUATE THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-TECH LISTED COMPANIES. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(3), 331-346. doi:10.3846/16111699.2015.1110713Halkos, G., & Skouloudis, A. (2017). Revisiting the relationship between corporate social responsibility and national culture. Management Decision, 55(3), 595-613. doi:10.1108/md-12-2016-0868Halkos, G., & Skouloudis, A. (2016). National CSR and institutional conditions: An exploratory study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 1150-1156. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.047Skouloudis, A., & Evangelinos, K. (2011). A research design for mapping national CSR terrains. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19(2), 130-143. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.606338ACHIM, M.-V., BORLEA, S.-N., & MARE, C. (2015). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FOR THE ROMANIAN ECONOMY. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 17(3), 458-474. doi:10.3846/16111699.2013.834841JERÓNIMO SILVESTRE, W., ANTUNES, P., & LEAL FILHO, W. (2016). THE CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY TYPOLOGY: ANALYSING SUSTAINABILITY DRIVERS AND FOSTERING SUSTAINABILITY AT ENTERPRISES. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 513-533. doi:10.3846/20294913.2016.1213199Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137-151. doi:10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001Tebini, H., M’Zali, B., Lang, P., & Perez-Gladish, B. (2015). The Economic Impact of Environmentally Responsible Practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(5), 333-344. doi:10.1002/csr.1383Gherghina, Ş. C., & Vintilă, G. (2016). Exploring the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Policies on Firm Value: the Case of Listed Companies in Romania. Economics & Sociology, 9(1), 23-42. doi:10.14254/2071-789x.2016/9-1/2Li, S., Ngniatedema, T., & Chen, F. (2017). Understanding the Impact of Green Initiatives and Green Performance on Financial Performance in the US. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(6), 776-790. doi:10.1002/bse.1948Jankalová, M., & Jankal, R. (2017). The assessment of corporate social responsibility: approaches analysis. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4(4), 441-459. doi:10.9770/jesi.2017.4.4(4)García-Melón, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Gómez-Navarro, T., & Mendez-Rodriguez, P. (2016). Assessing mutual funds’ corporate social responsibility: a multistakeholder-AHP based methodology. Annals of Operations Research, 244(2), 475-503. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2132-5Miralles-Quirós, M. del M., & Miralles-Quirós, J. L. (2015). Improving Diversification Opportunities for Socially Responsible Investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 339-351. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2691-4Schwartz, M. S. (2003). Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 195-213. doi:10.1023/a:1022933912939Hellsten, S., & Mallin, C. (2006). Are ‘Ethical’ or ‘Socially Responsible’ Investments Socially Responsible? Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 393-406. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-0001-xChatterji, A., & Levine, D. (2006). Breaking down the Wall of Codes: Evaluating Non-Financial Performance Measurement. California Management Review, 48(2), 29-51. doi:10.2307/41166337Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723-1742. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.039Capelle-Blancard, G., & Monjon, S. (2012). Trends in the literature on socially responsible investment: looking for the keys under the lamppost. Business Ethics: A European Review, 21(3), 239-250. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2012.01658.xTrinks, P. J., & Scholtens, B. (2015). The Opportunity Cost of Negative Screening in Socially Responsible Investing. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 193-208. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2684-3Nainggolan, Y., How, J., & Verhoeven, P. (2015). Ethical Screening and Financial Performance: The Case of Islamic Equity Funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 83-99. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2529-5Lesser, K., Rößle, F., & Walkshäusl, C. (2016). Socially responsible, green, and faith-based investment strategies: Screening activity matters! Finance Research Letters, 16, 171-178. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2015.11.001Von Wallis, M., & Klein, C. (2014). Ethical requirement and financial interest: a literature review on socially responsible investing. Business Research, 8(1), 61-98. doi:10.1007/s40685-014-0015-7Girerd-Potin, I., Jimenez-Garcès, S., & Louvet, P. (2013). Which Dimensions of Social Responsibility Concern Financial Investors? Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 559-576. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1731-1Bertrand, P., & Lapointe, V. (2015). How performance of risk-based strategies is modified by socially responsible investment universe? International Review of Financial Analysis, 38, 175-190. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2014.11.009Lean, H. H., Ang, W. R., & Smyth, R. (2015). Performance and performance persistence of socially responsible investment funds in Europe and North America. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 34, 254-266. doi:10.1016/j.najef.2015.09.011Lyn, E. O., & Zychowicz, E. J. (2010). The Impact of Faith-Based Screens on Investment Performance. The Journal of Investing, 19(3), 136-143. doi:10.3905/joi.2010.19.3.136Xiao, Y., Faff, R., Gharghori, P., & Min, B.-K. (2015). The Financial Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: Insights from the Intertemporal CAPM. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(2), 353-364. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2894-8Reddy, K., Mirza, N., Naqvi, B., & Fu, M. (2017). Comparative risk adjusted performance of Islamic, socially responsible and conventional funds: Evidence from United Kingdom. Economic Modelling, 66, 233-243. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.007Muñoz, F., Vargas, M., & Marco, I. (2013). Environmental Mutual Funds: Financial Performance and Managerial Abilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(4), 551-569. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1893-xVan Duuren, E., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2015). ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(3), 525-533. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2610-8Ibikunle, G., & Steffen, T. (2015). European Green Mutual Fund Performance: A Comparative Analysis with their Conventional and Black Peers. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2), 337-355. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2850-7Revelli, C., & Viviani, J.-L. (2014). Financial performance of socially responsible investing (SRI): what have we learned? A meta-analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 158-185. doi:10.1111/beer.12076Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2011). Is ethical money financially smart? Nonfinancial attributes and money flows of socially responsible investment funds. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20(4), 562-588. doi:10.1016/j.jfi.2010.12.003Humphrey, J. E., Warren, G. J., & Boon, J. (2015). What is Different about Socially Responsible Funds? A Holdings-Based Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 263-277. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2583-7Charlo, M. J., Moya, I., & Muñoz, A. M. (2017). Sustainable Development in Spanish Listed Companies: A Strategic Approach. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(3), 222-234. doi:10.1002/csr.1403Charlo, M. J., Moya, I., & Muñoz, A. M. (2013). Sustainable Development and Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based on the FTSE4Good IBEX Index. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(4), 277-288. doi:10.1002/bse.1824Windolph, S. E. (2011). Assessing Corporate Sustainability Through Ratings: Challenges and Their Causes. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 1-22. doi:10.14448/jes.01.0005Searcy, C., & Elkhawas, D. (2012). Corporate sustainability ratings: an investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 79-92. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022Ziegler, A., & Schröder, M. (2010). What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? Ecological Economics, 69(4), 848-856. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.10.009Utz, S., & Wimmer, M. (2014). Are they any good at all? A financial and ethical analysis of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Asset Management, 15(1), 72-82. doi:10.1057/jam.2014.8Gangi, F., & Varrone, N. (2018). Screening activities by socially responsible funds: A matter of agency? Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 842-855. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.228Verheyden, T., & De Moor, L. (2014). The Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Define and Evaluate Socially Responsible Investments. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2382813Lamata, M. T., Liern, V., & Pérez-Gladish, B. (2016). Doing good by doing well: a MCDM framework for evaluating corporate social responsibility attractiveness. Annals of Operations Research, 267(1-2), 249-266. doi:10.1007/s10479-016-2271-8Escrig-Olmedo, E., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Rivera-Lirio, J. M. (2015). Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 142-162. doi:10.1002/bse.1904Montiel, I., & Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and Measuring Corporate Sustainability. Organization & Environment, 27(2), 113-139. doi:10.1177/1086026614526413Pérez-Gladish, B., Méndez, P., & M’Zali, B. (2012). Ranking Socially Responsible Mutual Funds. International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering, 1(2), 59-84. doi:10.4018/ijeoe.2012040104García‐Martínez, G., Guijarro, F., & Poyatos, J. A. (2017). Measuring the social responsibility of European companies: a goal programming approach. International Transactions in Operational Research, 26(3), 1074-1095. doi:10.1111/itor.12438Cervelló-Royo, R., Guijarro, F., & Martinez-Gomez, V. (2017). Social Performance considered within the global performance of Microfinance Institutions: a new approach. Operational Research, 19(3), 737-755. doi:10.1007/s12351-017-0360-3Dow Jones Sustainability Indices. Methodologyhttps://www.sustainability-indices.com/Balcilar, M., Demirer, R., & Gupta, R. (2017). Do Sustainable Stocks Offer Diversification Benefits for Conventional Portfolios? An Empirical Analysis of Risk Spillovers and Dynamic Correlations. Sustainability, 9(10), 1799. doi:10.3390/su9101799Measuring “Intangibles”https://www.robecosam.com/csa/csa-resources/csa-methodology.htmlThomson Reuters ESG Scoreshttps://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/en_us/documents/methodology/esg-scores-methodology.pdfAouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2016). Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1027-1047. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3213-