Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Evaluation of the Lumac kit for the detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence.

By D Mackett, S Kessock-Philip, S Bascomb and C S Easmon

Abstract

Four hundred and twenty-two urine samples were screened for significant bacteriuria using bioluminescence and microscopy of uncentrifuged urine. A smaller number of false-negatives were seen with bioluminescence (10%) than with microscopy (40%) while both techniques gave a similar number of false-positives (18%). The kit required a large amount of manual preparation, largely pipetting. With this and the short shelf-life of the reconstituted reagents, it is not suitable for small numbers of urines. At 45p per urine, the cost of bioluminescence is too high

Topics: Research Article
Year: 1982
DOI identifier: 10.1136/jcp.35.1.107
OAI identifier: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:497457
Provided by: PubMed Central
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.