Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Updating Allport's and Batson's Framework of religious orientations: A reevaluation from the perspective of self-determination theory and Wullf's social cognitive modelm

By Bart Neyrinck, Willy Lens, Maarten Vansteenkiste and Bart Soenens


We theoretically and empirically evaluate Allport’s intrinsic-extrinsic and Batson’s quest religious orientations through the lens of self-determination theory (SDT) andWulff’s social-cognitive model. Confirming our theoretical analysis, we find that Allport’s intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy fails to correspond empirically to the differentiation between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation within SDT. Whereas Allport’s intrinsic religious orientation was positively related to internalized extrinsic motivation, his two extrinsic (i.e., personal and social) religious orientations were not systematically related to any of the discerned motives within SDT. Furthermore, Batson’s quest orientation was unrelated to any of the SDT concepts but was positively related to symbolic disbelief. The present findings suggest that Allport’s motivational orientations model needs both refinement and relabeling to better fit with recent theoretical evolutions in the field of motivational psychology.status: publishe

Topics: religious orientations, motivation
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Year: 2010
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Lirias
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.