Location of Repository

Co-learning in the collaborative mathematics classroom

By Julie-Ann Edwards and Keith Jones


Co-learning agreements between researchers and practitioners have been suggested as a way of generating research findings that are useful to improving schools and informing classroom practice. In this chapter we describe how a co-learning agreement was developed as a basis for researching aspects of the learning of mathematics in the classroom of a teacher whose pedagogy emphasised collaborative problem-solving as a major vehicle for learning mathematics. A study of co-operative group work in mathematics found that the perceptions of high achieving students (in terms of the purpose and benefits of group work) were more in line with those of their teacher than those of low achieving students. In contrast, the research reported in this chapter of a collaborative mathematics classroom revealed no such differences between students. In using a co-learning approach both authors felt that they learnt more about the processes of collaborating in researching and learning mathematics than they would have done with either a more traditional ‘data gathering’ approach led by the researcher or as a piece of action research by the teacher. The chapter suggests that co-learning can be a useful way of collaborating and describes the benefits such an approach can offer when researching classroom processes

Topics: LB, LB1603, QA
Publisher: Kluwer
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:11249
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles



  1. (1996). An analysis of collaborative group work in the primary school and the factors relevant to its success.
  2. (1995). An inclusive pedagogy in mathematics education. doi
  3. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development.
  4. (1998). Analysing power relationships in collaborative groups in mathematics. In
  5. (2000). Co-Learning Agreements in Mathematics Teaching and Teacher Education. Discussion organised at a meeting of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics.
  6. (1999). Collaboration through mathematics learning or collaboration in mathematics learning: Implicit or direct teaching? Unpublished MPhil (Research Methods) dissertation.
  7. (1996). Collaborative learning between peers: An overview. doi
  8. (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches.
  9. (1977). Communication and learning in small groups.
  10. (1996). Constructing a liberatory discourse in mathematics classrooms.
  11. (1997). Cooperative learning in the secondary mathematics class. doi
  12. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. doi
  13. (1992). Curriculum organisation and classroom practice in primary schools: A discussion paper. doi
  14. (1998). Educational research: A critique. doi
  15. (1981). Effect of co-operative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis.
  16. (1995). Ethnography: Principles in practice. doi
  17. (1998). Excellence in research on schools.
  18. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In
  19. (1997). Feminist pedagogy, socio-mathematical norms and the mathematics national curriculum. Unpublished MA(Ed) dissertation.
  20. (1995). Feminist perspectives on empowering research methodologies. In doi
  21. (1997). Friends as co-workers: Research review and classroom implications. doi
  22. (1992). Grouping for instruction in mathematics: A call for programmatic research on small-group processes. In
  23. Investing in learning: A policy statement with recommendations on research
  24. National directions in education research planning.
  25. (1999). Office for Standards in Education doi
  26. Office for Standards in Education (1998a). Standards in the primary curriculum.
  27. Office for Standards in Education (1998b). Setting in primary schools.
  28. (1994). Perceptions of intermediate students’ cooperative small-group work in mathematics. doi
  29. (1993). Researching change and changing the researcher.
  30. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. doi
  31. (1997). Scaffolding: A powerful tool in the social constructivist classroom. In
  32. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. doi
  33. (1999). Students’ views of learning mathematics in collaborative small groups.
  34. (1995). Talking and working together: Conditions for learning in complex instruction. doi
  35. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects.
  36. (1996). Teaching collaborative skills to primary school children in classroom-based work groups. doi
  37. (1997). The collaborative lens: A new look at on old research study. In
  38. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. doi
  39. (1976). The role of tutoring and problem solving. doi
  40. (1999). The struggle for a socially-just pedagogy: An ethnographic study of a mathematics classroom. Centre for Research in Mathematics Education Working Paper. Southampton:
  41. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. doi
  42. (1997). Theorizing collaboration: Some theoretical and methodological issues. In
  43. (1995). Using semi-structured interviews in small scale research. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
  44. (1995). Women’s ways of knowing in mathematics. In
  45. (1994). Working in small groups: a learning situation? In

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.