A Critique to Utopia of Praxis——And a Discussion with Mr Deng Xiaomang


新老实践美学把实践作为本体论的范畴,把实践当作自由的活动,以实践来说明审美的性质,实际上构造了一个“实践乌托邦”。实践本来是历史科学的概念,不具有哲学本体论的地位;而且作为异化的、现实的劳动,也不具有自由和超越的性质。因此,不能以实践作为美学的基本范畴,实践不能说明审美的本质。Both old and new aesthetics of praxis take the praxis as an ontological category and a free activity, and explains the nature of aesthetics by praxis, and actually construct a "utopia of praxis". Praxis is originally a concept of history, and it does not have a position of philosophical ontology, while labor, as being alienated and realistic, does not have the nature of freedom and transcendence. Therefore, Praxis should not be a basic category of aesthetics, and could not explain the nature of aesthetics as well

Similar works

Full text


Xiamen University Institutional Repository

Provided original full text link
oaioai:dspace.xmu.edu.cn:2288/152969Last time updated on 6/10/2020

This paper was published in Xiamen University Institutional Repository.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.