Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Safe asleep? Human-machine relations in medical practice

By M. Mort, D. Goodwin, A.F. Smith and C. Pope

Abstract

In the process of anaesthesia the patient must surrender vital functions to the care of clinicians and machines who will act for, and advocate for the patient during the surgical procedure. In this paper, we discuss the practices and knowledge sources that underpin safety in a risky field in which many boundaries are crossed and dissolved. Anaesthetic practice is at the frontier not only of conscious/unconsciousness but is also at the human/machine frontier, where a range of technologies acts as both delegates and intermediaries between patient and practitioner. We are concerned with how practitioners accommodate and manage these shifting boundaries and what kinds of knowledge sources the ‘expert’ must employ to make decisions. Such sources include clinical, social and electronic which in their various forms demonstrate the hybrid and collective nature of anaesthetised patients. In managing this collective, the expert is one who is able to judge where the boundary lies between what is routine and what is critical in practice, while the junior must judge the personal limits of expertise in practice. In exploring the working of anaesthetic hybrids, we argue that recognising the changing distribution of agency between humans and machines itself illustrates important features of human authorship and expertise

Topics: RT
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:17548
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1980). Architect or bee? The human technology relationship. Slough: Hand and Brain.
  2. (2004). Articulatingbodies: The case of muscular dystrophies.
  3. (2002). Building the trident network: A study of the enrolment of people, knowledge and machines.
  4. (2002). Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices.
  5. (1996). Computer related accidental death. In . Knowing machines.
  6. (2002). Cuttingsurg eons, walkingpatients: Some complexities involved in comparing. In
  7. (2003). Ethics and ethnography: An experiential account.
  8. (1994). From polaris to trident: The development of US fleet ballistic missile technology.
  9. (1983). Hand, brain and heart: A feminist epistemology for the natural sciences.
  10. (1990). Inventing accuracy.
  11. (2002). Located accountabilities in technology production.
  12. (2002). Making explicit anaesthetic expertise: Methodological considerations.
  13. (2000). On error management: Lessons from aviation.
  14. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York:
  15. (1994). Psychology and safety in aviation. In
  16. (1997). Rationalising medical work: Decision support techniques and medical practices.
  17. (2004). Self, agency & the surgical collective.
  18. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Simians, cyborgs, and women.
  19. (1998). Stabilising instabilities: The role of the laboratory in the UK Cervical ScreeningProg ramme. In
  20. (1982). The Lucas Plan: A new trade unionism in the making?.
  21. (1991). The manufacture of bodies in surgery.
  22. (1985). The material of male power. In
  23. (1967). The tacit dimension.
  24. (2002). The tacit order of teamwork: Collaboration and embodied conduct in anesthesia.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.