Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The effects of alcohol cue exposure on non-dependent drinkers' attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli

By W. Miles Cox, Michael A. Brown and Lisa J. Rowlands


Aims: The effects of university students’ habitual drinking practices and experimental alcohol cue exposure on their attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli were assessed.<br/>Methods: Participants were exposed in vivo to either an alcoholic or non-alcoholic beverage immediately prior to completing a cognitively demanding emotional Stroop task that uses alcohol-related and control words as potential distractors.<br/>Results: Regression analyses indicated that, for participants who were low consumers of alcohol, neither level of habitual drinking, type of cue exposure, nor their interaction predicted attentional bias for the alcohol-related stimuli. For high consumers of alcohol who were exposed to the alcoholic beverage (but not those exposed to the non-alcoholic beverage), the amount of alcohol that participants habitually drank significantly predicted the degree of attentional bias.<br/>Conclusions: The results indicate that, among non-dependent drinkers (unlike alcohol-dependent participants), alcohol-related attentional bias is not a generalized phenomenon, but occurs only under a specific set of circumstances

Topics: HN, BF
Year: 2003
DOI identifier: 10.1093/alcalc/agg010
OAI identifier:
Provided by: e-Prints Soton
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

Suggested articles


  1. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes.
  2. (1988). A motivational model of alcohol use.
  3. (2000). Alcohol abusers’ and nonabusers’ distraction by alcohol and concern-related stimuli.
  4. (1998). Alcohol-related words are distracting to both alcohol abusers and non-abusers in the Stroop colour naming task.
  5. (2000). Alcohol-related words of positive affect are more accessible in social drinkers’ memory than are other words when sip-primed by alcohol.
  6. (1994). Alcoholic subjects’ attentional bias in the processing of alcohol-related words.
  7. (2000). Alcoholics’ selective attention to alcohol stimuli: automated processing?
  8. (2000). Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence.
  9. (1997). Automaticity of cognitive biases in addictive behaviours: further evidence with gamblers.
  10. (1989). Autonomic and subjective responses to alcohol stimuli with appropriate control stimuli.
  11. (1995). Autonomic cued reactivity in alcoholics: the effect of olfactory stimuli.
  12. (1990). Comparsion of the SelfAdministered Alcoholism Screening Test (SAAST), and the Khavari Alcohol Test (KAT): results from an alcoholic population and their collaterals.
  13. (2000). Determinants and effects of attentional bias in smokers.
  14. (1999). Effects of alcohol cues on cognitive processing in heavy and light drinkers.
  15. (2001). Effects of contextual priming on reactions to craving and withdrawal stimuli in alcohol-dependent participants.
  16. (1995). Effects of disease-related cues in alcoholic inpatients: results of a controlled ‘Alcohol Stroop’ study.
  17. (1995). Effects of motivation and emotion on thought flow and cognition: assessment and findings.
  18. (1990). Incentive motivation, affective change, and alcohol use: a model.
  19. (2001). Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers.
  20. (1994). The effects of cue exposure on reaction time in male alcoholics.
  21. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.
  22. (1978). The Khavari Alcohol Test.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.