Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Improvements in quench factor modelling

By P.A. Rometsch, M.J. Starink and P.J. Gregson


In this contribution, the validity of a number of key quench factor analysis (QFA) assumptions is discussed. It is shown that the incorporation of a square root dependency of yield strength on precipitate volume fraction provides a sounder physical basis for quench factor modelling. Peak-aged strength/hardness prediction accuracies are not affected, but C-curve positions are. It is also demonstrated that transformation kinetics are described more correctly by a modified Starink–Zahra equation than by a Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov type equation, yielding better prediction accuracies when a physically realistic Avrami exponent of 1.5 or greater is used. Finally, a regular solution model is introduced to quantify the influence of the solute solubility temperature-dependency on the minimum strength. These improvements are all implemented within the framework of classical QFA

Topics: TN, QA, TA
Year: 2003
OAI identifier:
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles


  1. 10 Time (sec) T e m p e r a t u r
  2. (1984). Aluminum – properties and physical metallurgy,
  3. (1991). Heat treating of aluminum alloys,
  4. (1965). Meshii (Eds.), Lattice Defects in Quenched Metals,
  5. (1965). Physical Metallurgy,
  6. (1968). Precipitation Hardening,
  7. (1971). Quench Hardening in Metals,
  8. (1991). Quenching of steel, in:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.