Article thumbnail

LightTx: A Lightweight Transactional Design in Flash-based SSDs to Support Flexible Transactions

By Youyou Lu (5358302), Jiwu Shu (5358305), Jia Guo (5061470), Shuai Li (5358299) and Onur Mutlu (5357288)


Flash memory has accelerated the architectural evolution of storage systems with its unique characteristics compared to magnetic disks. The no-overwrite property of flash memory has been leveraged to efficiently support transactions, a commonly used mechanism in systems to provide consistency. However, existing transaction designs embedded in flash-based Solid State Drives (SSDs) have limited support for transaction flexibility, i.e., support for different isolation levels betweentransactions, which is essential to enable different systems to make tradeoffs between performance and consistency. Since they provide support for only strict isolation between transactions, existingdesigns lead to a reduced number of on-the-fly requests and therefore cannot exploit the abundant internal parallelism of an SSD. There are two design challenges that need to be overcome to supportflexible transactions: (1) enabling a transaction commit protocol that supports parallel execution oftransactions; and (2) efficiently tracking the state of transactions that have pages scattered over different locations due to parallel allocation of pages. In this paper, we propose LightTx to address these two challenges. LightTx supports transaction flexibility using a lightweight embedded transactiondesign. The design of LightTx is based on two key techniques. First, LightTx uses a commit protocol that determines the transaction state solely inside each transaction (as opposed to having dependencies between transactions that complicate state tracking) in order to support paralleltransaction execution. Second, LightTx periodically retires the dead transactions to reduce transactionstate tracking cost. Experiments show that LightTx provides up to 20.6% performance improvement due to transaction flexibility. LightTx also achieves nearly the lowest overhead in garbage collection and mapping persistence compared to existing embedded transaction designs.</p

Topics: Computer Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering not elsewhere classified, solid state drive, flash memory, transaction support, atomicity, durability
Year: 2018
DOI identifier: 10.1184/r1/6468962.v1
OAI identifier:
Provided by: KiltHub
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)

  • To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

    Suggested articles