Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Mobility, fixity, agency: Australia’s working holiday programme

By Nick Clarke

Abstract

Recent writings on transnational corporeal<br/>mobility have been dominated by at least two<br/>concerns: mobility as ever-expanding or even<br/>complete; and mobility as determined by<br/>economic restructuring. In this paper, I<br/>confront such writings with empirical material<br/>from primarily qualitative research into<br/>Australia’s working holiday programme,<br/>which was established in 1975 to allow British<br/>citizens between the ages of 18 and 26 to work<br/>and holiday in Australia for a period of up to<br/>12 months. And I confront such writings with<br/>M. P. Smith’s (2001) agency-oriented approach<br/>to transnational urbanism, which I extend<br/>with two arguments. Firstly, since agency is<br/>not a simple possession of intent or motivated<br/>human beings, the achievement of mobility<br/>rests on both human actors and non-human<br/>actants. Secondly, since mobility is not simply<br/>increasing, the achievement of mobility rests<br/>alongside what we might call relative<br/>contingent fixity

Topics: G1, GT
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:38383
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). Hooking Up. Farrar Straus and Giroux:
  2. (1997). I May Be Some Time: Ice and the English Imagination. Faber and Faber: London Urry J.
  3. (1994). Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory.
  4. (1999). Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity. Routledge: London
  5. (1996). The Global Age: State and Society Beyond Modernity. Polity: Cambridge Amin
  6. (1986). The world city hypothesis. Development and Change 17(1): 69-84 23 Geertz C.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.