Article thumbnail

Management swing potential for bioenergy crops

By S.C. Davis, R.M. Boddey, B.J.R. Alves, A.L. Cowie, B.H. George, S.M. Ogle, P. Smith, van M. Noordwijk and van M.T. Wijk


Bioenergy crops are often classified (and subsequently regulated) according to species that have been evaluated as environmentally beneficial or detrimental, but in practice, management decisions rather than species per se can determine the overall environmental impact of a bioenergy production system. Here, we review the greenhouse gas balance and management swing potential' of seven different bioenergy cropping systems in temperate and tropical regions. Prior land use, harvesting techniques, harvest timing, and fertilization are among the key management considerations that can swing the greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy from positive to negative or the reverse. Although the management swing potential is substantial for many cropping systems, there are some species (e.g., soybean) that have such low bioenergy yield potentials that the environmental impact is unlikely to be reversed by management. High-yielding bioenergy crops (e.g., corn, sugarcane, Miscanthus, and fast-growing tree species), however, can be managed for environmental benefits or losses, suggesting that the bioenergy sector would be better informed by incorporating management-based evaluations into classifications of bioenergy feedstocks

Topics: greenhouse-gas emissions, land-use change, life-cycle assessment, soil organic-carbon, miscanthus x giganteus, oil production systems, palm oil, mallee biomass, western-australia, mitigation options
Year: 2013
DOI identifier: 10.1111/gcbb.12042
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Wageningen Yield
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.