Location of Repository

Multi-modal discrimination learning in humans: evidence for configural theory

By Edward S. Redhead

Abstract

Human contingency learning was used to compare the predictions of configural and elemental theories. In three experiments, participants were required to learn which indicators were associated with an increase in core temperature of a fictitious nuclear plant. Experiments 1 and 2 investigated the rate at which a triple-element stimulus (ABC) could be discriminated from either single-element stimuli (A, B, and C) or double-element stimuli (AB, BC, and AC). Experiment 1 used visual stimuli, whilst Experiment 2 used visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli. In both experiments the participants took longer to discriminate the triple-element stimulus from the more similar double-element stimuli than from the less similar single-element stimuli. Experiment 3 tested for summation with stimuli from either single or multiple modalities and summation was found only in the latter. Thus the pattern of results seen in Experiments 1 and 2 was not dependent on whether the stimuli were single- or multi-modal nor was it dependent on whether the stimuli could elicit summation. This pattern of results is consistent with the predictions of Pearce’s (1987) configural theory

Topics: BF
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:44796
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2001). A comparison of the Rescorla-Wagner and Pearce models in a negative patterning and summation problem.
  2. (2000). A componential theory of Pavlovian conditioning. In
  3. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning.
  4. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement.
  5. (1973). Design and analysis: A researchers’ handbook. Englewood Cliffs,
  6. (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus.
  7. (2002). Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning.
  8. (1980). Loss of associability by a compound stimulus comprising excitatory and inhibitory elements.
  9. (2005). Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning.
  10. (2003). Similarity and discrimination in human Pavlovian conditioning.
  11. (1995). Similarity and discrimination learning.
  12. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model.
  13. (1997). Some determinants of response summation.
  14. (1998). Some factors that determine the influence of a stimulus that is irrelevant to a discrimination.
  15. (1994). Summation and configuration between and within sensory modalities in classical conditioning of the rabbit.
  16. (2002). Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
  17. (1995). Summation in autoshaping.
  18. (1999). The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: evidence central processing limitation.
  19. (2002). The effects of using stimuli from three different dimensions on autoshaping with a complex negative patterning discrimination.
  20. (1993). The influence of an irrelevant stimulus on two discriminations.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.