Location of Repository

Spatial exploration patterns determine navigation efficiency: trade-off between memory demands and distance travelled

By Tamas Makany, Edward S. Redhead and Itiel E. Dror


A total of 41 participants explored a novel square-shaped environment containing five identical boxes each hiding a visually distinct object. After an initial free exploration the participants were required to locate the objects first in a predetermined and subsequently in an optional order task. Two distinct exploration strategies emerged: Participants explored either along the main axes of the room (axial), or in a more spatially spread, circular pattern around the edges of the room (circular). These initial exploration strategies influenced the optimality of spatial navigation performance in the subsequent optional order task. The results reflect a trade-off between memory demands and distance efficiency. The more sequential axial strategy resulted in fewer demands on spatial memory but required more distance to be travelled. The circular strategy was more demanding on memory but required less subsequent travelling distance. The findings are discussed in terms of spatial knowledge acquisition and optimality of strategy representations

Topics: BF
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:47627
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles



  1. (2003). Automatic recognition of explorative strategies in the Morris water maze. doi
  2. (1996). Early-blind subjects’ spatial abilities in the locomotor space: Exploratory strategies and reaction-to-change. doi
  3. (1996). Human performance on the traveling salesman problem. doi
  4. (1999). Human spatial navigation: Cognitive maps, sexual dimorphism, and neural substrates. doi
  5. (2004). Human spatial orientation and way-finding analysis with Ethovision in a real arena maze.
  6. (1992). Influence of spatial exploration patterns on cognitive mapping by blindfolded sighted persons.
  7. (2005). Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. doi
  8. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. doi
  9. (1997). Modelling the evolution of human trail systems. doi
  10. (2003). Online trajectory classification. doi
  11. (1999). Reaction to spatial novelty and exploratory strategies in baboons. doi
  12. (1999). Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: Components of cognitive processing. doi
  13. (2004). Shortest paths and networks. doi
  14. (1998). Space is the machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Spatial Exploration Patterns and Efficiency
  15. (1981). Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. doi
  16. (1996). Strategies for indoor wayfinding: The role of orientation. doi
  17. (2004). Strategy representation: An analysis of planning knowledge. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,
  18. (2005). The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: A review. doi
  19. (2003). The well-learnt route and the path less travelled: Distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. doi
  20. (2005). Transfer of spatial behaviour controlled by a landmark array with distinctive shape. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.