Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold

By Tim S. Meese, Mark A. Georgeson and Daniel H. Baker

Abstract

A fundamental problem for any visual system with binocular overlap is the combination of information from the two eyes. Electrophysiology shows that binocular integration of luminance contrast occurs early in visual cortex, but a specific systems architecture has not been established for human vision. Here, we address this by performing binocular summation and monocular, binocular, and dichoptic masking experiments for horizontal 1 cycle per degree test and masking gratings. These data reject three previously published proposals, each of which predict too little binocular summation and insufficient dichoptic facilitation. However, a simple development of one of the rejected models (the twin summation model) and a completely new model (the two-stage model) provide very good fits to the data. Two features common to both models are gently accelerating (almost linear) contrast transduction prior to binocular summation and suppressive ocular interactions that contribute to contrast gain control. With all model parameters fixed, both models correctly predict (1) systematic variation in psychometric slopes, (2) dichoptic contrast matching, and (3) high levels of binocular summation for various levels of binocular pedestal contrast. A review of evidence from elsewhere leads us to favor the two-stage model

Topics: RE, BF
Year: 2006
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:47918
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2006). A gain-control theory of binocular combination. doi
  2. (1980). A transducer function for threshold and suprathreshold human vision. doi
  3. (1981). Albrecht,D.G.,&Geisler,W.S.(1991).Motionselectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex.
  4. (2004). Area summation and masking. doi
  5. (2005). Binocular summation at contrast threshold: A new look. doi
  6. (2005). Binocular summation, dichoptic masking and contrast gain control [Abstract]. J o u r n a lo fV i s i o n doi
  7. (2004). Binocular summation, interocular suppression and contrast gain control: Psychophysical model and data [Abstract]. Perception,
  8. (2004). Contrast discrimination and pattern masking: Contrast gain control with fixed additive noise [Abstract].
  9. (1981). Contrast discrimination in noise. doi
  10. (2005). Contrast discrimination with simultaneous monocular anddichopticmasks[Abstract].
  11. (2000). Contrast gain control in the visual cortex: Monocular versus binocular mechanisms.
  12. (1980). Contrast masking in human vision. doi
  13. (2004). Denoising and contrast constancy. doi
  14. (2004). Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: Implications for binocular vision and visual awareness. doi
  15. (1998). Different mechanisms underlie three inhibitory phenomena in cat area 17. doi
  16. (1984). discrimination. doi
  17. (2006). Fixed or variable noise in contrast discrimination? The jury’s still outI. doi
  18. (1981). Further developments in binocular summation. Perception & doi
  19. (2004). Grating and plaid masks indicate linear summation in a contrast gain pool. doi
  20. (1979). Humans deprived of normal binocular vision have binocular interactions tuned to size and orientation. doi
  21. (2005). Interocular masking and summation indicate two stages of divisive contrast gain control [Abstract]. Perception, doi
  22. (2004). Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. doi
  23. (2006). Monoptic and dichoptic cross-orientation masking are not the same mechanism [Abstract].
  24. (1981). Phase effects in monoptic and dichoptic temporal integration: Flicker and motion detection. doi
  25. (2006). Singularities in the inverse modeling of 2AFC contrast discrimination data. doi
  26. (1974). Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms. doi
  27. (1977). Spatial properties of binocular neurons in the human visual system. doi
  28. (1994). Stereo matching precedes dichoptic masking. doi
  29. (1973). The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation. doi
  30. (1989). Visual pattern analyzers. doi
  31. (2004). Why is spatial stereoresolution so low? doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.