Location of Repository

Learners’ understanding of the definitions and hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals: towards a theoretical framing

By Taro Fujita and Keith Jones


Defining and classifying quadrilaterals, though an established component of the school mathematics curriculum, appears to be a difficult topic for many learners. The reasons for such difficulties relate to the complexities in learning to analyse the attributes of different quadrilaterals and to distinguish between critical and non-critical aspects. Such learning, if it is to be effective, requires logical deduction, together with suitable interactions between concepts and images. This paper reports on an analysis of data from a total of 263 learners. The main purpose of the paper is to present a theoretical framing that is intended to inform further studies of this important topic within mathematics education research. This theoretical framing relates prototype phenomenon and implicit models to common cognitive paths in the understanding of the relationship between quadrilaterals

Topics: LB1603, LB2361, QA
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:49731
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles



  1. (2000). A change in understanding with demonstration in geometry,
  2. (1995). A study of the growth of mathematical understanding based on the equilibration theory: an analysis of interviews on understanding inclusion relations between geometrical figures,
  3. (1992). A study on the influences of visual imagery in the teaching of geometry, in: Iwago,
  4. (1995). Children’s construction process of the concepts of basic quadrilaterals
  5. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with special reference to limits and continuity, doi
  6. (1980). Concept images and some common cognitive paths in the development of some simple geometric concepts,
  7. (1999). Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play,
  8. (2003). Geometric construction as an educational material mediating between elementary and secondary school mathematics: theory and practice to promote transformation from empirical to logical recognition,
  9. (2006). If you can turn a rectangle into a square, you can turn a square into a rectangle”: young students’ experience the dragging tool, doi
  10. (2003). Interpretations of National Curricula: the case of geometry doi
  11. (1998). Investigating students understanding of the relationships among quadrilaterals, in:
  12. (1914). Mathematical definitions and education, in: Poincaré, H, Science and Method (trans. doi
  13. (2006). Primary trainee teachers’ understanding of basic geometrical figures in Scotland,
  14. (1990). Psychological aspects of Learning Geometry, doi
  15. (2007). Rectangle and rhombi: how well do pre-service teachers know them? Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1, Content Knowledge. Available online at: http://www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu (published February 2007; accessed 18
  16. (1986). Structure and Insight: a theory of mathematics education (Orlando:
  17. (2005). Students’ conceptions of a mathematical definition, doi
  18. (2007). The Classification of Quadrilaterals: a study in definition (Charlotte, NC:
  19. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking, doi
  20. (2003). The place of experimental tasks in geometry teaching: learning from the textbooks design of the early 20th Century, doi
  21. (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals,
  22. (1991). The role of definitions in the teaching and learning of mathematics, in: doi
  23. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division, doi
  24. (1993). The theory of figural concepts, doi
  25. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought,
  26. (1998). To teach definitions in geometry or teach to define?
  27. (2002). Trainee primary teachers’ knowledge of geometry for teaching.
  28. (1989). van Hiele levels and achievement in writing geometry proofs, doi
  29. (2000). What difference does it make? Children views of the difference between some quadrilaterals,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.