Location of Repository

Deconstructing normalisation: clearing the way for inclusion

By Andrew Culham and Melanie Nind

Abstract

This paper considers two major movements affecting the lives of people with an intellectual disability: normalisation and inclusion. The authors look back at the normalisation movement, reviewing its aims, processes and outcomes, and explore its relationship and compatibility with inclusion. In looking forward to the realisation of the inclusion agenda they ask whether normalisation is a suitable platform on which to build inclusion, or whether a process of deconstruction is needed. They discuss what lessons can be learnt from normalisation for the inclusion movement

Topics: L1
Year: 2003
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:54618
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1980). A brief overview of the principle of normalisation. In
  2. (1994). A question of friendship: community care and the relationships of people with learning difficulties. doi
  3. (1999). Actively seeking inclusion: pupils with special needs in mainstream schools. doi
  4. (1980). An ordinary life: comprehensive locally-based residential services for mentally handicapped people. London: King's Fund Centre.
  5. (1981). Campaign for People with Mental Handicaps (CMH).
  6. (1995). Creating an inclusive school. doi
  7. (2000). Crossing boundaries: change and continuity in the history of learning disability. Kidderminster: British Institute of Learning Disabilities.
  8. (1991). Current service ideologies and responses to challenging behaviour: social role valorization or vaporization. doi
  9. (1992). Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: facilitating learning for all students.
  10. (2001). Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. doi
  11. (1995). Disability baggage: changing the educational research terrain. In
  12. (1990). Disability equality in the classroom: a human rights issue. London: ILEA. D o w n l o a d e d B y : [ U n i v e r s i t y o f S o u t h a m p t o n ] A t : : J u l y Deconstructing normalisation 77 Mesibov,
  13. (1989). Framework for accomplishments. Decanture, GA: Responsive Systems Associates.
  14. (1998). From them to us: an international study of inclusion in education. doi
  15. (2000). Good times, bad times: women with learning difficulties telling their stories. Kidderminster: British Institute of Learning Disabilities.
  16. (2000). Inclusion and choice: mutually exclusive principles in special educational needs? In
  17. (2000). Inclusion and exclusion policy in England: who controls the agenda? In
  18. (1999). Inclusion or delusion: can one size fit all? Support for Learning, doi
  19. (2000). Inclusion vs. normalisation: are they compatible in ethos? MA Dissertation,
  20. (1995). Inclusion, paradigms, power and participation. In
  21. (1996). Inclusion: a guide for educators.
  22. (1996). Inclusion: educating students with and without disabilities. doi
  23. (1995). Inclusive education in Europe.
  24. (1995). Inclusive education: from policy to school implementation. In
  25. (1997). Inclusive education: romantic, subversive or realistic? doi
  26. (1998). Inclusive practice: what, why and how? In doi
  27. (1996). Inclusive schooling in Australia? Not yet. doi
  28. (1997). Inclusive schools for an inclusive society. doi
  29. (1995). Innovations in developing countries for people with disabilities.
  30. (1999). Insiders or outsiders: normalisation and women with learning difficulties. doi
  31. (1998). Invisible to themselves or negotiating identity? The interactional management of being 'intellectually disabled'. doi
  32. (1997). Is inclusivism possible? doi
  33. (1997). Mainstream or special? Educating students with disabilities. doi
  34. (1994). Meaningful content and contexts for learning.
  35. (1980). Nitsch (Eds.), Normalisation, social integration and community services
  36. (1995). Normalisation-metatheory or metaphysicas? A conceptual critique. doi
  37. (2001). Normalisation, emancipatory research and inclusive research in learning disability. doi
  38. (1992). Normalisation: from theory to practice. In
  39. (1989). Normalisation: the next steps.
  40. (1985). Normalization training through PASS 3: team leader manual. Decanture, GA: Responsive Systems Associates.
  41. (1992). Normalization, needs and schools.
  42. (1992). Normalization: a reader for the nineties.
  43. (1975). PASS 3: Program Analysis of Service Systems: a method for the quantitative evaluation of human services. A handbook.
  44. (1983). PASSING: Program Analysis of Service Systems Implementation of Normalisation Goals.
  45. (1991). Pride against prejudice.
  46. (1997). Self-advocacy for people with learning difficulties: does it have a future? DiUsability and doi
  47. (1985). Setting the record straight: a critique of some frequent misconceptions of the normalization principle. doi
  48. (1985). Sheep in wolfs clothing: impact of normalisation teaching on human services and service providers. doi
  49. (1991). So, who wants to be normal? doi
  50. (1983). Social role valorization: a proposed new term for the principle of normalization. doi
  51. (1994). Special needs in the classroom: a teacher education guide. doi
  52. (1997). Stereotyped behaviours: how should we think about them? doi
  53. (2000). Teachers' understanding of interactive approaches in special education. doi
  54. (1985). The basis and logic of the normalization principle. doi
  55. (1980). The definition of normalisation: Update, problems, disagreements, and misunderstandings. In
  56. (1986). The intellectually handicapped in Sweden-new legislation in a bid for normalisation.
  57. (1998). The making of the inclusive school.
  58. (1970). The normalisation principle-implications and comments.
  59. (1976). The normalization principle and its human management implications. In
  60. (1980). The normalization principle. In doi
  61. (1985). The origin and nature of our institutional models.
  62. (1993). The politics of disablement. doi
  63. (1972). The principle of normalisation. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
  64. (1981). The principle of normalization: a foundation for effective services. London: Campaign For Mentally Handicapped People.
  65. (1992). Towards a sociological critique of the normalisation principle. doi
  66. (1992). What is normalisation? In
  67. (1996). When age-appropriateness isn't appropriate.
  68. (1989). Whose 'ordinary life' is it anyway? doi
  69. (1998). Women with disabilities: missing voices. doi
  70. (2000). Working towards inclusive education: social contexts. doi
  71. (1994). World conference on special needs education: access and quality.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.