Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Ethics in quasi-experimental research on people with severe learning disabilities: dilemmas and compromises

By M. Kellett and M. Nind


The present paper follows up the theme of research ethics that has been discussed in the British Journal of Learning Disabilities in recent years. We join the debate in the capacity of people involved in doing research on, rather than with, people with learning disabilities. We focus on our own quasi-experimental study evaluating the Intensive Interaction approach for pupils who are preverbal. We question our own practice, and illustrate some of the dilemmas which we have faced in our research and some of the compromises which we have reached.<br/><br/

Topics: LB
Year: 2001
OAI identifier:
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles


  1. (1994). Access to communication: developing the basics of communication with people with severe learning difficulties through Intensive Interaction. doi
  2. (1987). Applying educational research: a practical guide for teachers. doi
  3. (2001). Blackwell Science Ltd, doi
  4. (1992). Changes the social relations of research production. doi
  5. (1975). Design and analysis of time series experiments. doi
  6. (1998). Developing an emancipatory research agenda: possibilities and dilemmas.
  7. (1996). Discussion: Age-appropriate or developmentallyappropriate activities? In: Coupe
  8. (1997). Doing disability research. doi
  9. (1996). Efficacy of Intensive Interaction: developing sociability and communication in people with severe and complex learning difficulties using an approach based on caregiver–infant interaction. doi
  10. (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of Intensive Interaction teaching with pupils with profound and complex learning difficulties. doi
  11. (1998). Introducing Intensive Interaction for people with profound learning disabilities living in small staffed houses in the community.
  12. (1978). Multiple baseline in institutional research: pitfalls of measurement and procedural advantage.
  13. (1984). Neonatal behavioural assessment scale. doi
  14. (1999). Participation in research by people with learning disabilities: origins and issues. doi
  15. (1998). Practising partnership: involving people with learning difficulties in research. doi
  16. (1987). Pre-verbal communication schedule.
  17. (1986). Profound retardation and multiple impairment, doi
  18. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. doi
  19. (1998). Research in special needs education: objectivity or ideology? doi
  20. (1996). Rules of engagement: doing disability research. doi
  21. (1998). Some ethical and methodological issues in research with people with learning difficulties. doi
  22. (2000). The researched opinions on research: disabled people and disability research. doi
  23. (1996). When age-appropriateness isn’t appropriate. In: Coupe
  24. (2000). Working with the experts: collaborative research with people with an intellectual disability. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.