Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Meaning holism and de re ascription

By Daniel Whiting

Abstract

According to inferential role semantics, for an expression to have a meaning is for it to have a role in inference. It is widely recognised that any such theory seems to face a communication problem. Since no two speakers share the same beliefs, they will inevitably make different inferential transitions involving an expression. Hence, given inferential role semantics, the same word in different mouths will possess a different meaning and be understood differently. In this paper, I outline Brandom’s proposed solution, which involves an appeal to de re ascriptions. That strategy, I argue, fails in several respects to solve the communication problem

Topics: B1
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:59095
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1992). A Study of Concepts.
  2. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism.
  3. (2001). Brandom’s Burdens:
  4. (1994). Conceptual Role Semantics.”
  5. (2006). Conceptual Role Semantics.” In The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
  6. (1993). Does an Inferential Role Semantics Rest Upon a
  7. (2003). Epistemic Analyticity: A Defence.”
  8. (2007). Fregean Sense and Anti-Individualism.”
  9. (1980). From a Logical Point of View,
  10. (1994). Inferential Role Semantics and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.”
  11. (1994). Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.
  12. (2003). Making it Implicit:
  13. (1993). Meaning Holism Defended.”
  14. Norms, and Normative Facts: Reply to Habermas.”
  15. (1997). On Sinn and Bedeutung.” Reprinted in Beaney,
  16. (2000). Philosophy of Language.
  17. (2003). Quine and Davidson on Thought, Language, and Reality. Cambridge:
  18. (1992). Quine versus Chomsky on the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.”
  19. (2005). Reflections on Meaning.
  20. (1991). Representation and Reality.
  21. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words.
  22. (1997). The Frege Reader.
  23. (1991). Why Meaning (Probably)

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.