Location of Repository

European approaches to ensure good animal welfare

By Isabelle Veissier, Andrew Butterworth, Bettina Bock and Emma Roe

Abstract

Conventions to protect domestic animals during transport, farming and slaughter were established by the Council of Europe and approved by many European states. Conventions are followed by recommendations that specify how the general principles of conventions apply for the different species. The European Union (EU) started discussions on animal welfare in the 1980s and adopted a series of Directives to protect farm animals. Both Recommendations and Directives define higher space allowance, more opportunity for social contacts, balanced diet, enriched environment, and limitation of harmful procedures. Animal welfare law varies across Europe with Northern states generally having the most stringent legislation. There is also an increasing variety of farm production schemes within European member states which contain animal welfare standards that go beyond the legal minimum. Some schemes are retailer-led; others are founded by producer organizations, sometimes in co-operation with non-governmental organisations. The differences between schemes reflect higher national legal requirements, higher quality industry schemes, organic production schemes and specific welfare-friendlier schemes. The communication of these higher welfare standards to consumers through the use of a quality assurance scheme logo on a product or packaging claims does not always happen. Farmers differ in their motivation for participating in animal welfare schemes. Some are mainly encouraged by premium prices; others give ethical reasons for changing towards animal friendly production methods. Although there is no official link between the Brambell report and European regulations to protect farm animals, the fact that the first European regulations to protect animals were adopted 10 years after the report and were in line with the conclusions of the report suggest that the report was influential, not only in the United Kingdom but also in the rest of Europe

Topics: HC, SF, QL
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:64123
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2005). A comparative analysis of retail structures. In: Roex,
  2. (1995). A Guide to Quality Management Systems for the Food Industry.
  3. (2007). Analysis of the retail survey of products that carry welfare-claims and of non-retailer-led assurance schemes whose logos accompany welfare-claims. In: Kjaernes,
  4. (1992). FAWC updates the five freedoms.
  5. (1997). of Amsterdam amending the treaty on European Union, the treaties establishing the European communities and related acts, Official Journal, 340, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/11997D/htm/ 11997D.html (last visit
  6. (2006). Quality assurance models in the food supply chain.
  7. (2005). Review of socio-political and market developments of animal welfare schemes. In: Roex,
  8. (2008). Veissier et al./Applied

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.