Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Conclusions: reassessing the framework

By Sabina Avdagic, Martin Rhodes and Jelle Visser


This chapter assesses the book's analytical framework. Regarding social pact emergence, overall the evidence supports our central argument that pacts emerge via political processes driven by interests and power, not because of the role of ideas, through social learning, or via spontaneous coordination in response to problem loads. In instances of both success and failure, power balances, utilitarian costbenefit calculations as well as, ultimately, some 'shared perception' or appreciation of the problems or challenges ahead were critical in generating (or preventing) social pact responses. As for institutionalization, power-distributional mechanisms, often in combination with utilitarian concerns, are most frequently cited as explanation for both institutionalization and deinstitutionalization, and can trump functionalist pressures. Although we found that pacts sometimes produced cooperative norms, in no case were norms strong enough to determine institutionalization, or neutralize the effects of power shifts, severe economic setbacks, or dissatisfaction with outcomes

Publisher: Oxford University Press
Year: 2011
DOI identifier: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199590742.003.0011
OAI identifier:
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

Suggested articles

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.