Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

General practitioners' perceptions of the appropriateness and inappropriateness of our of hours calls

By Helen Smith, Val Lattimer and Steve George

Abstract

Background: The number of out-of-hours calls to general practitioners (GPs) has increased steadily during the past 20 years. The proportion of inappropriate calls are reportedly increasing but we know very little about how GPs judge a call to be appropriate or inappropriate. Aim: To determine the factors that influence GPs' perceptions of the appropriateness or inappropriateness of out-of-hours calls. Design of Study: Postal questionnaire survey. Setting: GP members of the Wessex Primary Care Research Network (WReN) and the Northern Primary Care Research Network (NoReN). Method: General Practitioners were asked to write down what they meant by an 'appropriate' and 'inappropriate' out-of-hours call. The free text was subjected to content analysis. Results: Detailed responses were received from 146 (73%) GPs. General practitioners appear to have a well developed classification of the appropriateness of out-of-hours calls. Factors that make calls appropriate include not only the nature of patients' symptoms and illness but also non-medical factors such as patients' compliance and politeness. Conclusion: The inclusion by GPs of non-medical factors in their conceptualisation of the appropriateness of out-of-hours calls may contribute to patients' confusion about what is and is not appropriate and also to the apparent failure of patient education initiatives designed to decrease inappropriate demand

Publisher: Royal College of General Practitioners
Year: 2001
OAI identifier: oai:sro.sussex.ac.uk:1999
Sorry, our data provider has not provided any external links therefore we are unable to provide a link to the full text.

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.