oaioai:doaj.org/article:36d828cbc03740619e24f6ad08f1b0fc

Comparison of Two Methods for Upper Lid Fascia Lata Sling in Congenital Blepharoptosis: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> Normal 0 false false false MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> </xml><![endif]--> <!--[if gte mso 10]> <style>
 /* Style Definitions */
 table.MsoNormalTable
 {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
 mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
 mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
 mso-style-noshow:yes;
 mso-style-parent:"";
 mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
 mso-para-margin:0cm;
 mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
 mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
 font-size:10.0pt;
 font-family:"Times New Roman";
 mso-ansi-language:#0400;
 mso-fareast-language:#0400;
 mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
 </style> <![endif]--> <p>PURPOSE: To compare the results of two different methods of upper lid sling with autogenous fascia lata in the treatment of congenital ptosis. METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial, patients with congenital upper lid ptosis and poor levator function (< 4mm) were randomly assigned to two different methods of upper lid sling: group A, bitriangular fascia sling (modified Crawford method) and group B, monotriangular fascia sling (modified Fox method). RESULTS:  This study included 30 upper eyelids (15 eyelids in each surgical group) of 19 patients (8 unilateral and 11 bilateral cases) with congenital ptosis. Mean increase in eyelid fissure height was 2.7±2.3 mm in group A and 3.4±2.2 mm in group B, respectively. Change in eyelid fissure in both groups was significant (P < 0.001, paired t-test) but intergroup difference was not (P=0.4, independent sample t-test). Early complications such as corneal epithelial defects and entropion, and late complications such as undercorrection were comparable in the two groups. No patient experienced recurrent ptosis requiring reoperation in either group. CONCLUSION:  The monotriangular method of upper lid fascia sling can be used instead of the more popular bitriangular method. Advantages include less need for fascial tissue, less periocular scar formation and a shorter period of anesthesia.</p&gt

Similar works

Full text

thumbnail-image

Directory of Open Access Journals

Provided original full text link
oaioai:doaj.org/article:36d828cbc03740619e24f6ad08f1b0fcLast time updated on 12/18/2014

This paper was published in Directory of Open Access Journals.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.