Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Any space left? Homeless resistance by place-type in Los Angeles County

By Geoffrey DeVerteuil, Matt Marr and David Snow


This study develops a more nuanced concept of homeless resistance, incorporating a range of resistance behaviors (exit, adaptation, persistence, and voice) that bridge the gap between current frameworks that either romanticize or ignore it. We also consider the possibility that different kinds of space may theoretically allow for different kinds of resistance. To this end, we employ an ecological approach to homeless space by classifying Los Angeles County into three place-types (prime, transitional, and marginal). We empirically consider the issue of resistance within the hardening context among a group of 25 homeless informants, focusing on whether and how some of them have exercised their voices and sought to ameliorate one or more aspects of their situation, as well as how resistance may vary by place-type

Topics: HN, GF
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles


  1. 2000b, Of nomads and vagrants: Single homelessness and narratives of home as place. Environment and Planning D: doi
  2. (1996). A decade of understanding homelessness in the USA: From characterization to representation. doi
  3. (2006). A Right to Housing: Foundation for a New Social Agenda. doi
  4. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. doi
  5. (2006). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis.
  6. (2007). Beyond punitive regulation? New Zealand local governments’ responses to homelessness. doi
  7. (2000). Census Tract files. doi
  8. (1993). Checkerboard Square: Culture and Resistance in a Homeless Community. doi
  9. (2009). Complexity not collapse: Recasting the geographies of homelessness in a “punitive” age. doi
  10. (1982). Displacement: How to Fight It.
  11. (1993). Doing Naturalistic Inquiry. doi
  12. (1985). Economies of the makeshift: Deindustrialization and homelessness in
  13. (2000). Entanglements of power: Geographies of domination/resistance. In
  14. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. doi
  15. (2007). for the Homeless, doi
  16. (2003). Homeless mobility, institutional settings, and the new poverty management. doi
  17. (2000). Housing histories and homeless careers: A biographical approach. doi
  18. (2008). Imag(in)ing “homeless places”: Using autophotography to (re)examine the geographies of homelessness. doi
  19. (2000). Informal non-kin networks among homeless Latino and African American men. doi
  20. (2001). Introduction. In doi
  21. (1993). Malign Neglect: Homelessness in an American City. doi
  22. (2005). Mapping Neoliberal American Urbanism. doi
  23. (1996). On resisting resistance. doi
  24. (1997). Out of Place: Homeless Mobilizations, Subcities, and Contested Landscapes. doi
  25. (1988). Paths in homelessness: A view from the street. In
  26. (2003). Private needs and public space: Politics, poverty, and anti-panhandling by-laws in Canadian cities.
  27. (2006). Redistribution and its discontents: On the prospects of committee work in public mental health and like settings.
  28. (2001). Space, politics, and the survival strategies of the homeless. doi
  29. (2001). Statistical Methods for Geography. Thousand Oaks, CA:
  30. (2004). Systematic inquiry into barriers to researcher access: Evidence from a homeless shelter.
  31. The annihilation of space by law: The roots and implications of antihomeless laws in the United States. doi
  32. (2000). The dialectics of dystopia: Disorder and zero tolerance in the city. doi
  33. (2001). The Global City (second revised edition).
  34. (2006). The local state and homeless shelters: Beyond revanchism? doi
  35. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. doi
  36. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. doi
  37. (2005). The socio-spatial exclusion of homeless people in Germany and the United States.
  38. (2000). The use of cluster analysis in distinguishing farmland prone to residential development: A case study of Sterling, doi
  39. (2007). Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.