Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Towards a contextual approach to the place–homeless survival nexus: An exploratory case study of Los Angeles County

By Matthew D. Marr, Geoffrey Deverteuil and David Snow

Abstract

The characteristics of the immediate locale greatly affect the ability of homeless people to adapt to life on the street and in shelters, with different types of places nurturing different circumstances for survival. Current conceptualizations of the place–survival nexus are too narrow, relying on small-scale, intensive studies of particular places that are known to sustain homeless survival while ignoring more suburban and exurban locales, as well as failing to set these places of survival within the larger socio-economic spaces of the metropolitan area. Further, the literature is heavily qualitative, lacking any kind of ‘‘big picture” quantitative assessment of the nexus. In response, we contribute to the place–survival nexus literature by developing a typology of space for homeless survival and then use interview data to examine the variation in survival strategies across three types of urban space in Los Angeles County. Our results speak to how our innovative and exploratory approach enabled a broader, more extensive and variegated understanding of place–survival among homeless people than previous studie

Topics: G1, HN
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:69173
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). 8 For discussion of intra-city mobility among the homeless, see DeVerteuil
  2. A (2001) Introduction. doi
  3. (2007). Better Must Come: Exiting Homelessness in Two Global Cities,
  4. (1992). City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. doi
  5. (2005). Coalition to End Hunger and Homelessness
  6. (1993). Down on Their Luck: A Study of Homeless Street People. doi
  7. (2002). Downtown’s Human Tragedy: It’s Not Acceptable Anymore. Center City Association,
  8. (1985). Economies of the makeshift: deindustrialization and homelessness in New York City. Urban Anthropology
  9. (2009). et al./Cities xxx (2009) xxx–xxx 11 ARTICLE IN PRESS Please cite this article in press as: Marr, MD, et al. Towards a contextual approach to the place–homeless survival nexus: An exploratory case study of Los Angeles County. doi
  10. (2007). for the Homeless (NCH)
  11. (2001). Helping America’s Homeless: Emergency Shelter or Affordable Housing? The Urban Institute Press, doi
  12. (2003). Homeless mobility, institutional settings, and the new poverty management. doi
  13. (2006). Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA)
  14. (1996). Homelessness and the Latino paradox.
  15. (1999). Homelessness, AIDS, and Stigmatization in the United States at the End of the Twentieth Century. doi
  16. (2008). Intransigent LA. doi
  17. (1993). Malign Neglect: Homelessness in an American City. doi
  18. (2009). Marr et al./Cities xxx (2009) xxx–xxx ARTICLE IN PRESS Please cite this article in press as: Marr, MD, et al. Towards a contextual approach to the place–homeless survival nexus: An exploratory case study of Los Angeles County. doi
  19. (1983). Men without property: the tramp’s classification and use of urban space. doi
  20. (2001). New landscapes of urban poverty management.
  21. (2001). Not in my city’: local governments and homelessness policies in the Los Angeles metropolitan region. doi
  22. (1989). Old Men of the Bowery: Strategies for Survival among the Homeless. doi
  23. (1997). Out of Place: Homeless Mobilizations Subcities and Contested Landscapes. doi
  24. (2008). Population Estimates. doi
  25. (1997). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientist and Practitioners.
  26. (2003). Reckogning with Homelessness.
  27. (2002). Rural Homelessness. doi
  28. (2000). Short-Term Housing Directory of Los Angeles County,
  29. (1998). Social Networks Among the Inner-City Homeless: A Comparative Study of Latino and African-American Men. Doctoral Dissertation,
  30. (1990). Social networks in time and space: homeless women in skid row, Los Angeles. doi
  31. (1997). Something Left to Lose: Personal Relations and Survival Among New York’s Homeless. doi
  32. (2001). Space, politics, and the survival strategies of the homeless. doi
  33. (2001). Statistical Methods for Geography. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  34. (1997). The annihilation of space by law: the roots and implications of anti-homeless laws in the United States. doi
  35. (1925). The City: Suggestions for Investigation of Human Behavior in the Urban Environment.
  36. (2000). The dialectics of dystopia: disorder and zero tolerance in the city. doi
  37. (2004). The geography of homelessness in American communities: concentration or dispersion? doi
  38. (2001). The Global City. doi
  39. (2006). The local state and homeless shelters: beyond revanchism? doi
  40. (1994). The service hub concept in human services. doi
  41. (1990). The story of Edward: the everyday geography of elderly single single room occupancy (SRO) hotel tenants. doi
  42. (1998). The subsistence adaptation of homeless mentally ill women.
  43. (1996). The Unequal Homeless: Men on the Street Women in Their Place. doi
  44. (2000). The use of cluster analysis in distinguishing farmland prone to residential development: a case study of Sterling, doi
  45. (1987). Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. doi
  46. (1999). Utilization of mental health and substance abuse services among homeless adults in Los Angeles. doi
  47. (2005). Welfare neighborhoods: anatomy of a concept. doi
  48. (2004). Work together, live apart? Geographies of racial and ethnic segregation at home and at work. doi
  49. (1996). Young and Homeless in Hollywood: Mapping Social Identity. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.