Location of Repository

Evaluation of work-related psychosocial factors and regional musculoskeletal pain: results from a EULAR Task Force

By G.J. Macfarlane, N. Pallewatte, P. Paudyal, F.M. Blyth, D. Coggon, G. Crombez, S. Linton, P. Leino-Arjas, A.J. Silman, R.J. Smeets and D. van der Windt

Abstract

Objectives: to establish whether review articles provide consistent conclusions on associations between workplace psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal pain and, if differences exist, to explore whether this is related to the methods used.<br/>Methods: reviews, reported up to February 2007, that included consideration of workplace psychosocial factors and upper limb, back or knee pain were identified through searches of multiple databases. The specific work-related psychosocial factors considered were job demands, support, job autonomy and job satisfaction. The conclusions of each review on one or more of the psychosocial/musculoskeletal pain associations were extracted.<br/>Results: 15 review articles were identified that considered one or more of the regional pain syndromes included in the study. For back pain, the most consistent conclusions (four reviews positive out of six) were with high job demands and low job satisfaction. The studies of upper limb pain were exclusively related to shoulder and/or neck pain, and the most consistent positive conclusions were with high and low job demands (four reviews positive out of six and two reviews positive out of three, respectively). For knee pain, only a single review was identified. For individual reviews of back and upper limb pain, there were marked differences in the number of associations concluded to be positive between reviews.<br/>Conclusions: the reasons for reviews coming to different conclusions included that they were often evaluating different bodies of evidence (according to their search criteria, the year when the review was conducted, the role that quality assessment played in whether studies contributed to evidence, and the combination of risk factors addressed in individual studies), but more important was whether the review specified explicit criteria for making conclusions on strength of evidence. These conclusions emphasise the importance of developing standardised methods for conducting such evaluations of existing evidence and the importance of new longitudinal studies for clarifying the temporal relationship between psychosocial factors and musculoskeletal pain in the workplac

Topics: R1, BF
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:69630
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1997). A literature review of low back disorder surveillance measures and risk factors. doi
  2. (1991). A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. doi
  3. A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. doi
  4. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. doi
  5. Are psychosocial factors, risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist? A review of the epidemiological literature. doi
  6. Back pain in Britain: comparison of two prevalence surveys at an interval of 10 years. doi
  7. (1988). Back pain in middle age; occupational workload and psychologic factors: an epidemiologic survey. Spine doi
  8. (2000). Cohort study of occupational risk factors of low back pain in construction workers. Occup Environ Med doi
  9. (2004). Dose-response relations between occupational exposures to physical and psychosocial factors and the risk of low back pain. Occup Environ Med doi
  10. (2003). Fear of pain, physical performance, and attentional processes in patients with fibromyalgia. doi
  11. (2002). Health needs assessments for musculoskeletal disease: the first step—estimating the number of incident and prevalence cases. Chesterfield: Arthritis Research Campaign,
  12. (1994). Incidence of sciatic pain among men in machine operating, dynamic physical work, and sedentary work. Spine doi
  13. (2009). Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for workrelated musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity and low back.
  14. (1990). Neglected factors in chronic pain treatment outcome studies: referral patterns, failure to enter treatment, and attrition. doi
  15. Occupational and psychological factors increases the risk for back pain: a systematic review.
  16. Occupational risk factors for shoulder pain: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med 2000;57:433–42.
  17. occupational, and personal consequences of disability in patients with chronic fatigue.
  18. (2001). Pain as a reason to visit the doctor. A study in Finnish primary health care. doi
  19. (1999). Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain. doi
  20. (2001). Preventive interventions for back and neck pain problems: what is the evidence? Spine doi
  21. (1993). Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. doi
  22. (2009). Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain: a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies. Occup Environ Med 2004;61:e2. Extended report 890 Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:885–891.
  23. Psychosocial factors in the workplace-do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Study. Spine 1997;22:1137–42. doi
  24. Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain: a systematic review. doi
  25. (1998). Psychosocial risks for low back pain: are these related to work? Ann Rheum Dis doi
  26. Psychosocial work characteristics and psychological strain in relationt ol o w -back pain. doi
  27. Review of epidemiologic studies on occupational factors and lower extremity musculoskeletal and vascular disorders and symptoms. doi
  28. (2001). Review of the factors associated with musculoskeletal problems in epidemiological studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health doi
  29. (2003). Risk factors for newonset low back pain amongst cohorts of newly employed workers. Rheumatology doi
  30. (1996). Self reported physical exertion in geriatric care. A risk indicator of low back symptoms? Spine doi
  31. (2007). Sickness absence as a prognostic outcome measure for fibromyalgia: an observational study. Ann Rheum Dis
  32. (1986). social and occupational history as risk indicators for low-back trouble in a general population. Spine doi
  33. Soft-tissue rheumatic disorders of the neck and upper limb: prevalence and risk factors. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2003;33:185–203. doi
  34. (2001). The National Research Council. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: low back and upper extremities. doi
  35. The relationship between psychosocial work characteristics and low back pain: underlying methodological issues. doi
  36. (2004). Work factors as predictors of intense or disabling low back pain; a prospective study of nurses’ aides. Occup Environ Med doi
  37. (1998). Work-related low-back problems in nursing. doi
  38. (2005). Work-related musculoskeletal health and social support. Occup Med doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.