Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The open method of coordination – effectively preventing welfare state retrenchment?

By Milena Büchs


This article re-examines the division between "optimists" and "pessimists" within the literature on the Open Method of Coordination’s (OMC) effectiveness. Each of those "camps" tends to focus on a different question. "Optimists" are more concerned with the question of whether the OMC exerts an influence on the national level and through which mechanisms, whilst "pessimists" concentrate on the question of whether the OMC can "strengthen" EU social policy and therefore European welfare states. This article combines these two perspectives and argues that the OMC is indeed capable of influencing national policies through the dissemination of ideas and "learning" as the "optimists" stress. However, policy "learning" at the member state level is shaped and constrained by a variety of internal and external pressures. Against the hopes of most of the OMC "optimists", this makes the OMC largely ineffective in preventing welfare state retrenchme

Topics: H1
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles


  1. (1997). (3) Public debt within the EU-15 has indeed fallen from 69.9 per cent of GDP in
  2. (2004). (4) This might partly be due to methodological problems as, amongst other problems, social expenditure as per cent of GDP is sensitive to economic growth rates (see Castles 2007; Green-Pedersen
  3. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. doi
  4. (2002). Active Social Policies in the EU. Inclusion through participation? doi
  5. (2009). An additional major problem that the OMC identifies is the impact that ageing societies and ©
  6. (1996). Another area that is addressed within the OMC SP is pension policy, promoting “sustainable and adequate” pensions. An analysis of spending figures demonstrates that expenditure on pensions has fallen from 12.7 per cent of GDP in
  7. (2004). Between deliberation and discipline: soft governance in EU employment policy.
  8. (2000). Building a sustainable welfare state. doi
  9. (2002). Building Social Europe Through the Open Method of Coordination. Edited by C.
  10. (2009). by Milena Büchs Page doi
  11. (2009). by Milena Büchs Page 13 of 16 Commission.
  12. (2009). by Milena Büchs Page 16 of 16 of Tables Table 1: Total social expenditure, per cent of GDP (changes in italics) Source: Eurostat
  13. (2009). Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes. The influence of the open method of coordination on national reforms. London and doi
  14. (2006). Common objectives for the Open Method of Coordination in social inclusion and social protection:
  15. (2001). Coping with Permanent Austerity. Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies. doi
  16. (1997). Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. doi
  17. (2007). Discourse, learning and welfare state change: The case of german labour market reforms. doi
  18. (2009). Does supranational coordination erode its national basis? The case of European labour market policy and German industrial relations.
  19. (2003). Employment Outlook. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. doi
  20. (2009). EU law 'transformed'? Evaluating accountability and subsidiarity in the 'streamlined' OMC for Social Inclusion and Social Protection.
  21. European Integration online Papers (EIoP),
  22. (1994). European Social Policy. A Way Forward for the Union. A White Paper:
  23. (2004). Euros and Europeans. Monetary integration and the European model of society. Cambridge: doi
  24. (2005). Globalisation, domestic politics, and welfare state retrenchment in capialist democracies. doi
  25. (1996). if spending on LMP is standardised by unemployment rates, total labour market policy expenditure has not changed between
  26. (2009). instruments such as objectives, guidelines and targets are not legally binding, they ©
  27. (2004). Introduction: the many worlds of activation. doi
  28. (2009). Learning about policy learning. Reflections on the European Employment Strategy.
  29. (1997). measured by the gini coefficient, has also risen in the EU-15 from 29 in
  30. (2009). Money, votes or ‘good’ ideas? Partisan politics and the effectiveness of the European Employment Strategy in Austria and Ireland.
  31. (2009). Neither convergence nor frozen paths: bounded learning, international diffusion of reforms, and the Open Method of Coordination. In Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes. The influence of the open method of coordination on national reforms, doi
  32. (2007). New Governance in European Social Policy: The Open Method of Coordination. doi
  33. (2004). New governance in the European Union: A theoretical perspective. doi
  34. (2006). New modes of governance, the Open Method of Co-ordination and other fashionable red herring. doi
  35. (2004). New Risks, New Welfare. The transformation of the European welfare state. doi
  36. (1993). Policy learning” has been identified by OMC “optimists” as one of the main mechanisms through which the OMC operates and gains influence at the national level. “Policy learning” refers to the cognitive basis of policy-change. According to Hall
  37. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policy making in Britain. doi
  38. (2001). Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states. doi
  39. (2000). Presidency Conclusions: doi
  40. (1997). Presidency Conclusions: Luxembourg Extraordinary European Council Meeting on doi
  41. (2009). Reframing Social Citizenship. Oxford: doi
  42. (2007). Reshaping welfare states: activation regimes in Europe.
  43. (2003). Social Citizenship and Workfare in the U.S. and Western Europe: from status to contract. doi
  44. (2008). Soft governance in Hard Politics. European Coordination of Anti-Poverty Policies in France and Germany. doi
  45. (1993). Soft Law and Institutional Practice in the European Community. doi
  46. (2002). Supple coordination at EU level and the key actors' involvement.
  47. (2009). Taxation Trends in the European Union: Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  48. (2007). Testing the retrenchment hypothesis: an aggregate overview. In The Disappearing State? Retrenchment realities in an age of globalisation, doi
  49. (2004). the “pessimistic” literature on the OMC and social Europe so far does not refer to the wider literature on welfare state retrenchment (Castles 2007; Green-Pedersen
  50. (2004). The dependent variable problem within the study of welfare state retrenchment: defining the problem and looking for solutions. doi
  51. (2009). The double voluntarism in EU social dialogue and employment policy:
  52. (2007). the EES promotes “flexicurity” (that is more flexible labour markets combined with employment security), wage levels that do not exceed productivity growth and “reflect the labour market situation”, as well as the reduction of non-wage labour costs (CEC
  53. (2009). The effectiveness of soft governance in the field of European anti-poverty policy: operationalization and empirical evidence. doi
  54. (2008). The European Level Development and National Level Influence of the Open Method of Coordination: The cases of employment and social inclusion: PhD thesis, submitted to the European University Institute, Florence, on file with the author.
  55. (2003). The European model of 'social' capitalism. Can it survive European integration? doi
  56. (2002). The European social model: Coping with the challenges of diversity.
  57. (2006). The generosity of social insurance, doi
  58. (2009). The OMC and social Europe The “pessimists’” sceptical response to the “optimists’” “policy learning” approach is mainly ©
  59. (2003). The Open Method of Co-ordination and the European Welfare State. Discussion Paper No 11,
  60. (2009). The Open Method of Coordination and reform of national social and employment policies: influences, mechanisms, effects. In Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes. The influence of the open method of coordination on national reforms, doi
  61. (2005). The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies. Edited by doi
  62. (2009). The Open Method of Coordination on health care after the Lisbon Strategy II: Towards a neoliberal framing?
  63. (2003). The Open Method of Coordination: A new governance architecture for the European Union?: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, (accessed on
  64. (2009). The Open Method of Coordination: Underconceptualisation, overdetermination, depoliticisation and beyond.
  65. (2009). The Open Method of Cooridnation: a pathway to the gradual transformation of national employment and welfare regimes? In Changing European Employment and Welfare Regimes. The influence of the open method of coordination on national reforms, doi
  66. (2005). The politics of the new social policies: providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states. doi
  67. (2006). The politics of welfare state retrenchment: a literature review. doi
  68. (2007). The renewed Lisbon Strategy and social exclusion policy. doi
  69. (2009). The theme of “modernising” European welfare states highlights the need to adapt existing systems of social protection to structural economic changes, globalisation and ageing societies ©
  70. (2000). The theme of “strengthening” social Europe relates to two different aspects. The first emphasises the need to “reinforce”, “improve” (European Council
  71. (1996). there are interesting differences in different policy fields. Whilst expenditure on sickness and disability benefits has increased from 9.3 per cent of GDP in
  72. This definition combines elements of competing definitions and measurements of welfare state retrenchment (see amongst many Castles 2007; for quantitative approaches, Scruggs
  73. (1990). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. doi
  74. (2003). Welfare-state regress in western Europe: Politics, institutions, globalization, and Europeanization. doi
  75. (1996). Whilst the ratio of ALMP to total LMP expenditure has increased by almost 9 percentage points between
  76. (2002). Why We Need a New Welfare State. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.