Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Recent developments in podiatric prescribing in the UK and Australia

By Mark F. Gilheany and Alan M. Borthwick

Abstract

Commentary pape

Topics: R1
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:72563
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2003). Australia Government: doi
  2. (2005). Commission: Australia's Health Workforce - Productivity Commission Research Report Canberra: Australian Government; doi
  3. (2005). Health workforce redesign for the 21st century. Austral Health Rev doi
  4. (2009). Health: Allied health professions, prescribing and medicines supply scoping project report. London: Department of Health;
  5. Intergovernmental agreement for a National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for the Health Professions [http:/ /www.nhwt.gov.au/natreg.asp]
  6. (2006). Medical dominance in a changing world: the UK case. Health Sociol Rev doi
  7. National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission doi
  8. (2009). Non-medical prescribing in Australasia and the UK: the case of podiatry. doi
  9. Podiatrists 'should not prescribe'.
  10. Podiatrists Registration Board of Victoria,
  11. (2001). Prescribing and the defence of clinical autonomy. Sociol Health Illn doi
  12. (2008). Prescribing rights for pharmacists in Australia - are we getting any closer? Pharmacist
  13. Professions allied to medicine and prescribing. In Non-Medical Prescribing - Multi-disciplinary Perspectives Edited by: Nolan P, Bradley E. Cambridge: doi
  14. (2009). Putting Feet First - commissioning specialist services for the management and prevention of diabetic foot disease in hospitals. London: Diabetes UK;

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.