Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Evidence for a shift from true place navigation to directional responding in one variant of the morris water task.

By Derek A. Hamilton, Katherine G. Akers, Travis E. Johnson, James P. Rice, Felicha T. Candelaria and Edward S. Redhead


Previous work from our laboratory has demonstrated that rats display a preference for directional responding over place navigation in a wide range of procedural variants of the Morris water task. A preference for place navigation has only been observed when the pool is reduced as a cue by filling it with water. <br/><br/>Studies using dry-land mazes suggest that rats place navigate early in training and later switch to other forms of responding (e.g., motor). The present study evaluated whether rats switch from place navigation to directional responding in the “full pool” variant of the water task. Rats were given 12, 24, or 36 hidden platform training trials. <br/><br/>Probe trials with the pool repositioned in the room revealed a preference for place navigation in rats given 12 trials, an equal division of response preferences in rats given 24 trials, and a preference for directional responding in rats given 36 trials. These results indicate that the early preference for place navigation in the full pool water task is transient and yields to a preference for directional responding with continued training

Topics: BF
Year: 2009
OAI identifier:
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles


  1. (2003). An analysis of response, direction, and place learning in an open field and T maze. doi
  2. (1985). Blocking and overshadowing between intra-maze and extra-maze cues: A test of the independence of locale and guidance learning. doi
  3. (1999). Blocking in human place learning: Evidence from virtual navigation.
  4. (1999). Blocking in the Morris swimming pool. doi
  5. (1997). Blocking in the spatial domain. doi
  6. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. doi
  7. (1957). Discrimination of cues in mazes: A resolution of the ’place-vs.-response’ question. doi
  8. (1964). Effects of overtraining on acquisition and reversal of place and response learning. doi
  9. et al.(2002). A room with a view and a polarizing cue: Individual differences in the stimulus control of place navigation and passive latent learning in the water maze. doi
  10. (2007). How do room and apparatus cues control navigation in the Morris water task?: Evidence for distinct contributions to a movement vector. doi
  11. (2003). Human overshadowing in a virtual pool: Simple guidance is a good competitor against locale learning. doi
  12. (2002). Human place learning in a virtual Morris water task: Some important constraints on the flexibility of place navigation. doi
  13. (1996). Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. doi
  14. (1997). Interaction between piloting and beacon homing by rats in a swimming pool. doi
  15. (2003). Intra-hippocampal lidocaine injections impair acquisition of a place task and facilitate acquisition of a response task in rats. doi
  16. (1907). Kinesthetic and organic sensations: Their role in the reaction of the white rat to the maze. doi
  17. (1998). Locating an invisible goal in a water maze requires at least two landmarks.
  18. (2007). Preweanling rats solve the Morris water task via directional navigation. doi
  19. (2004). Rodent spatial navigation: At the crossroads of cognition and movement. doi
  20. (2004). Sequential control of navigation by locale and taxon cues in the Morris water task. doi
  21. (1993). Severity of spatial-learning impairment in aging -development of a learning index for performance in the Morris water maze. doi
  22. (1949). Spatial learning in the T-maze: The influence of direction, turn, and food location. doi
  23. (1981). Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. doi
  24. (1946). Studies in spatial learning. II. Place learning versus response learning. doi
  25. (1950). Studies in spatial learning. VIII. Place performance and the acquisition of place dispositions. doi
  26. task: Which cues define locations? Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 21, 1939.Place and Direction 20 Latency (s) Time (s) Crosses Proximity (cm) Group Preference Number Absolute Relative Absolute Relative Absolute Relative Absolute Relative
  27. (2005). The effects of hippocampal lesions on response, direction, and place learning in rats. doi
  28. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. doi
  29. (2008). The relative influence of place and direction in the Morris water task. doi
  30. (2007). Where am I? distal cue use requires sensitivity to start location change in the rat. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.