Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice

By Colin R. Kennedy and Donna C. McCann


Recent technological advances have made feasible<br/>universal newborn hearing screening and therefore early<br/>detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment.<br/>Over the past three years, new information has been<br/>published on whether early intervention is beneficial, the<br/>possibility of harm arising from newborn screening, and its<br/>cost. Dramatic progress has been made in the large scale<br/>implementation of universal screening in many parts of the<br/>western worl

Topics: BF, RJ101
Year: 2004
OAI identifier:
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles


  1. 7 to 9 year outcome of the Wessex Controlled Trial of Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening (UNHS). Arch Dis Child
  2. (1997). A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technol Assess doi
  3. A two-stage bipodal screening model for universal neonatal hearing screening. doi
  4. An investigation of maternal stress after neonatal hearing screening. doi
  5. (2000). Commentary on ‘neonatal screening for hearing impairment’. Arch Dis Child
  6. Community based universal neonatal hearing screening by health visitors using otoacoustic emissions. Arch Dis Child doi
  7. Confirmation of deafness in infancy. doi
  8. Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment: coverage, positive predictive value, effect on mothers and incremental yield. Acta Paediatr Suppl doi
  9. Developmental outcomes of children with hearing loss born in Colorado hospitals with and without universal newborn hearing screening programs. doi
  10. Dis Child 2004;in press.
  11. (2000). Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics doi
  12. (1998). Epidemiology of moderate to profound childhood hearing impairments in northern Finland: any changes in ten years? Scand Audiol doi
  13. Epidemiology of permanent childhood hearing impairment: implications for neonatal hearing screening. doi
  14. False positives in universal neonatal screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment. Lancet doi
  15. Hearing impairment: a population study of age at diagnosis, severity and language outcomes at 7 to
  16. (1998). Hearing Screening Trial Group. Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Lancet doi
  17. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otocacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission and auditory brain stem response test performance. Ear Hear doi
  18. Impact of family health insurance and other environmental factors on universal hearing screening program effectiveness. doi
  19. (1998). Language of early- and lateridentified children with hearing loss. doi
  20. (1998). Maternal anxiety and attitudes to universal neonatal screening. doi
  21. Measuring the prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment. doi
  22. Neonatal hearing screening: methods and outcome. doi
  23. Neonatal screening for hearing impairment. doi
  24. (2000). New York state universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: effects of screening protocol on inpatient outcome measures. Ear Hear doi
  25. (2010). Newborn hearing screening F383 on
  26. Newborn hearing screening in Western Australia.
  27. (1999). on the threshold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics doi
  28. (2004). Outcomes of children with mild to profound hearing congenital hearing loss at 7 to 8 years: a population study. Ear Hear doi
  29. (1983). Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974 and
  30. (1991). Prevalence and characteristics of children with serious hearing impairment in metropolitan Atlanta, doi
  31. Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study. doi
  32. (1998). Screening for congenital hearing impairment: time for a change. Arch Dis Child doi
  33. Six year effectiveness of a population based two tier infant hearing screening programme. Arch Dis Child doi
  34. The Colorado newborn hearing screening project, doi
  35. (1992). The epidemiology of childhod hearing impairment: factors relevant to planning of services. doi
  36. (2000). The New York State newborn hearing screening demonstration project: introduction and overview. Ear Hear doi
  37. (2003). The newborn hearing screening programme in England. doi
  38. Trends in age of identification and intervention in infants with hearing loss. Ear Hear 2003;24: doi
  39. Universal neonatal hearing screening: parental attitudes and concern. doi
  40. Universal newborn hearing screening programs and developmental outcomes. doi
  41. Universal newborn hearing screening. summary of evidence. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.