Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Evaluating learning and teaching: institutional needs and individual practices

By Veronica Bamber and Sally Anderson

Abstract

Rather than a rational, technical activity, evaluation reflects the socio-political dynamics of the evaluative context. This presents a challenge for universities and the individuals within them, who may assume that plans or policies for evaluation will result in straightforward outcomes. This small-scale study in one institution looks at the tensions between institutional evaluative needs and individual evaluative practices. The results indicate that for staff in the institution, evaluative activity is largely autonomous and self-driven, rather than following institutional policy. A discretionary framework for the evaluation of learning and teaching was developed which may be a useful tool for educational developers in their analysis of evaluative practice

Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2012
OAI identifier: oai:eresearch.qmu.ac.uk:2431

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1999). A handbook of techniques for formative evaluation.
  2. (2005). Academic labour and the politics of quality in higher education: a critical evaluation of the conditions of possibility of resistance.
  3. (1998). Big policies / small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy.
  4. (2008). Changing identities in higher education: Voicing perspectives.
  5. (1995). Changing leadership in universities.
  6. (2009). Changing the rules of engagement: down the disciplinary road. In
  7. (2005). Compulsory higher education teacher education: joined-up policies; institutional architectures; enhancement cultures.
  8. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment and Evaluation
  9. (1992). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco:
  10. (1998). Evaluation in higher education: Conceptual and epistemological foundations.
  11. (2011). Failing the challenge of institutional evaluation: how and why managerialism flourishes. In
  12. (1997). Formative evaluation, bordering on action research. Open University in Scotland,
  13. (1995). From the Collegial Academy to Corporate Enterprise: The Changing Cultures of Universities. In
  14. (2002). Higher education policy and institutional change: Intentions and outcomes in turbulent environments. Buckingham: SRHE and Open
  15. (1985). Knowledge creation and knowledge use in professional contexts.
  16. (1995). Less Control and More Vocationalism: The Australian and New Zealand Experience. In
  17. (1977). Morality and expediency: The folklore of academic politics.
  18. (1998). New managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures
  19. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work.
  20. (2008). Quality assurance and quality enhancement in higher education: Contested territories?
  21. (2009). Quality assurance for enhancement (keynote presentation). International network for quality assurance agencies in higher education (INQAAHE) conference
  22. (2000). Realising the university in an age of supercomplexity.
  23. (2009). Talking the talk, walking the walk: the work of an LTSN subject centre. In
  24. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: a conceptual analysis.
  25. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: SRHE and Open
  26. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective.
  27. (2008). Theory and legitimacy in professional education: a practitioner review of reflective processes within programmes for new academic staff.
  28. (2002). To what extent has the Dearing policy recommendation on training new lecturers met acceptance? Where Dearing went that Robbins didn’t dare.
  29. (2000). Training to teach in higher education: a research agenda.
  30. (1996). Transforming higher education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.