Location of Repository

Variability in ultraplankton at the Porcupine Abyssal Plain study site

By Adrian P. Martin, Mikhail V. Zubkov, R Holland, Glen Tarran and Peter Burkill


Observations of the ultraplankton (&lt;5 ?m) are presented from a 4 day mesoscale survey centred on the Porcupine Abyssal Plain (PAP) study site (49°00’N 16°30’W), in July 2006. The organisms enumerated include two groups of phytoplankton, Synechococcus cyanobacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, large viruses, and two size classes of heterotrophic protist. The dataset comprises over 400 samples from the mixed layer taken over a 100 × 100 km2 area at a spatial resolution of typically 2-3 km.<br/><br/>For phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria there is a clear bimodal structure to the histograms of abundance indicative of two distinct communities in the region. Using the strong bimodality of one of the phytoplankton groups’ histogram as a basis, the dataset is split into two subsets, with roughly 200 points in each, corresponding to the two histogram peaks. Doing so provides evidence that Synechococcus and viruses may also have a bimodal structure. Correlations between all pairings of these five organisms (both phytoplankton groups, Synechococcus, heterotrophic bacteria and viruses) are positive and quite high (r&gt;0.7). The two communities can therefore be characterised as high and low abundance. Although there is a coincidence of low abundances with high temperatures in the southwest corner of the region, where there was known to be an eddy present, the spatial distributions of these organisms over the whole region is poorly predicted by temperature (or salinity or density). Furthermore, the spatial distributions of heterotrophic protists are found to differ strongly from those of the other organisms, having a unimodal structure and no obvious large scale structure. The more random structure of the heterotrophs’ spatial distribution compared to their prey is consistent with previous results from the continental shelf, but is demonstrated for the open ocean here for the first time.<br/><br/>Spatial variability is a large potential source of error in point samples, such as those comprising time series or transect cruises, unless a sufficient number of samples are taken. This large dataset is further used to provide guidance on the number of samples that would be required to estimate the mean abundance for the organisms accurately in this spatially variable region. Even if the bimodal structure was known initially, many of the organisms would require 10 or more samples to estimate the mean with 25% accuracy

Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:158537
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles



  1. (1997). Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid strain SYBR Green I.
  2. (2007). Flow cytometric enumeration of DNA-stained oceanic planktonic protists. doi
  3. (2007). Mesoscale eddies driving spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the productivity of the euphotic zone of the NE Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research II, this doi
  4. (2003). On the role of biological 437 dynamics in plankton patchiness at the mesoscale: an example from the eastern North Atlantic Ocean. doi
  5. Seasonal and inter-annual biogeochemical variations at doi
  6. (2002). Shorttimescale variability of picophytoplankton abundance and cellular parameters in surface waters of the Alboran Sea (western Mediterranean). doi
  7. (2008). spatial variability: an example from the Celtic Sea. Progress in Oceanography, doi
  8. (2006). Syringe pumped high speed flow cytometry of oceanic phytoplankton. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.