Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

REPLY Paper or Plastic Revisited: Let’s Keep Them Both—Reply to

By Stone Tennen, Niall Bolger, Eshkol Rafaeli, Patrick E. Shrout, Amie S. Green, Harry T. Reis, J. C. Coyne, R. J. Larsen, A. Delongis, M. K. T. Takarangi, Patrick E. Shrout, Amie S. Green and Department Of Psychology


P. Shrout, & H. T. Reis, 2006). The authors were pleased to find more agreement than disagreement regarding the choice of methods for conducting diary studies. It is clear that continued critical evaluation of all diary methods, both paper and plastic, is warranted. However, on the basis of their initial findings, the authors conclude that paper diaries are still likely to have a valuable place in researchers ’ toolboxes

Topics: diary studies
Year: 2014
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.