Towards person-centered healthcare via realistic evidence-based medicine – informing the debate historically


There is a widespread feeling that, despite the many successes of evidence based medicine (EBM), the movement is now facing a serious crisis. The current debate on this ‘crisis’ may be understood as resulting from four interrelated evolutions which EBM went through. Our historical analysis of these evolutions leads us to two conclusions. First, it looks like the spirit of anti-authoritarianism, (self-)criticism, independence of thought and empowerment of individual physicians of the early days has gone. Second, the often-invoked image of the ‘golden past’ of ‘real EBM’ is distorted, as it reflects contemporary nuanced ideas rather than the initial program of the movement. Thus, history teaches us that we should forget about the idealized image of ‘real EBM’ and embrace realistic EBM instead

Similar works

Full text


The University of Buckingham Press Journals

Last time updated on 30/10/2019

This paper was published in The University of Buckingham Press Journals.

Having an issue?

Is data on this page outdated, violates copyrights or anything else? Report the problem now and we will take corresponding actions after reviewing your request.