Location of Repository

Philosophers of mathematics commonly distinguish between explanatory and non-explanatory proofs. An important subclass of mathematical proofs are proofs by induction. Are they explanatory? This paper addresses the question, based on general principles about explanation. First, a recent argument for a negative answer is discussed and rebutted. Second, a case is made for a qualified positive take on the issue. In the philosophy of mathematics it is commonplace to distinguish between explanatory and non-explanatory proofs. The former explain why their conclusion is true, while the latter merely show that their conclusion is true. 1 An important subclass of mathematical proofs are proofs by induction. However, intuitions are divided about which of them, if any, are explanatory. 2 This suggests that direct reliance on intuitions is a poor guide for deciding the question. An argument from more general principles about explanation i

Year: 2013

OAI identifier:
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.371.8989

Provided by:
CiteSeerX

Download PDF:To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.