Location of Repository

We carried out two experiments to investigate how people reason about the spatial relations among objects. The experiments were designed to test a theory of spatial inference based on mental models. The theory predicts that problems requiring only one model of the spatial layout to be constructed should be easier than those requiring more than one model to be constructed, even when the multiple-model problems have valid conclusions. A contrasting theory, based on rules of inference, predicts that problems based on fewer inferential steps should be easier than problems based on more steps. The first experiment held constant the number of inferential steps specified by the inference-rule theory, but varied the number of models required to make a valid response: the one-model problems were reliably easier than the problems requiring more than one model. The second experiment contrasted opposing predictions from the two theories, and once again the results supported the model-based theory. 6 1989 Academic &SS, IIIC. In daily life, many inferences depend on relations. If, for example, a law asserts that dog owners must pay a tax, and Alicia owns a labrador, then one can readily infer that she must pay the tax. Strictly speaking, the inference is based on a missing premise that establishes the relation of class-inclusion between labradors and dogs. Ordinary individuals, unlike logicians, neither notice that the premise is missing nor categorize the inference as invalid on these grounds. They know that labradors are dogs and they automatically use this knowledge in drawing the conclusion. The relation of class inclusion is ubiquitous, perhaps because it gives rise to transitive inferences, and so it plays a central part in theories of semantic memor

Year: 2013

OAI identifier:
oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.370.6464

Provided by:
CiteSeerX

Download PDF:To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.