This factsheet presents and critiques the findings of recent studies estimating the prevalence of youth “sexting.” The authors contend that research findings to date have been inconsistent and many widely‐publicized studies have been flawed in their design. It is difficult to compare findings and draw clear conclusions due to inconsistent terminology between studies and the inclusion of material not of primary concern to the public and law enforce‐ ment, such as text‐only messages, images of adults, or images of youth that do not constitute child pornography under legal statutes. These findings are then often reported in distorted or exaggerated ways by the media, lead‐ ing to public misperception. The authors present a number of suggestions to future researchers and to journalists wishing to cite statistics on sexting. The problem of teen “sexting ” has captured a great deal of media attention, causing concern among parents, educators, and law enforcement officials. In reaction to these concerns, a number of studies have been conducted by researchers from many different organizations to estimate the prevalence of the problem, with widely‐varying findings. This fact sheet will provide an overview of the most widely‐cited studies, alon
To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.