Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Special thanks to my advisor Christine Parlour for continuous support and guidance. Thanks also to

By Bradyn Breon-drish, Robert Anderson, Nicolae Gârleanu, Simon Gervais, Hayne Lel, Jacob Sagi and Johan Walden For Helpful

Abstract

I study a standard Grossman and Stiglitz (1980) noisy rational expectations economy, but relax the usual assumption of the normality of fundamental and supply. My solution approach sidesteps with the typical “conjecture and verify ” method and enables me to analytically solve an entire class of previously intractable nonlinear models that nests the standard model. I show how: (1) price “jumps ” and “crashes ” may arise endogenously, purely due to learning effects, (2) observation of the net trading volume of informed and noise traders may be valuable for investors in the economy as it can provide a refinement of the information conveyed by price, (3) the value of acquiring information may be non-monotonic in the number of informed traders, leading to multiple equilibria in the information market, and (4) the relation between disagreement and future returns is ambiguous. In short, many of the results from noisy rational expectations models are not robust. Finally, I introduce monotone likelihood ratio conditions that determine the signs of the various comparative statics, which represents the first demonstration of the importance of the MLRP for comparative statics in this literature

Topics: JEL Classifications, D82, G14 Keywords, noisy rational expectations, asymmetric information, learning, trading volume, strategic complementarity, information acquisition
Year: 2012
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.362.9078
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.