Location of Repository

The influence of social processes on the timing of cancer diagnosis: a research agenda

By J. Corner and L. Brindle

Abstract

This paper sets out to review the influence of social processes on the timing of the diagnosis of cancer and to explore the potential for promoting earlier diagnosis by addressing social factors that influence symptom recognition and the diagnostic process. Social processes refer to the means by which culture and social organisation may impact on timely cancer diagnosis. The paper calls for concerted action around an important and developing research agenda that may prove highly valuable in the quest to secure prompt diagnosis for cancer and through it improved outcomes for individuals. <br/><br/

Topics: R1
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.soton.ac.uk:176385
Provided by: e-Prints Soton

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. A visual summary of the EUROCARE 4 results: a UK perspective.
  2. (1996). accounts of health and illness: dilemmas and representations. Sociol Health Ill doi
  3. Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using general practice research database. doi
  4. (1994). Cancer survival and the duration of symptoms. An analysis of possible forms of the risk function. doi
  5. Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results?
  6. (2002). Colonising the future: temporal perceptions and health-relevant behaviours across the adult lifecourse. Sociol Health Ill doi
  7. Containment’ as an analytical framework for understanding patient delay: a qualitative study of cancer patients’ symptom interpretation processes. Soc Sci Med 2010;71:378e85. doi
  8. (1975). Culture and symptoms: an analysis of patients’ presenting complaints. In: doi
  9. (2007). Deconstructing symptoms: developing an ethnomethodological understanding of ‘patient delay’ in lung cancer diagnosis. In:
  10. (1995). Delay in seeking a cancer diaognosis: delay stages and psychological comparison processes.
  11. (1981). Delay in the presentation of breast symptoms for consultant investigation. Community Med doi
  12. Determining patient and primary care delay in the diagnosis of cancerdlessons from a pilot study of patients referred for suspected cancer. doi
  13. (2008). Early lung cancer intervention in Doncaster (ELCID) project report for NHS Doncaster primary care trust. doi
  14. (1998). Emergency admission for cancer: a matter of survival?
  15. (1983). Ethnography: principles in practice. London: Tavistock Publications,
  16. (2006). Experience of health changes and reasons for delay in seeking care: a UK study of the months prior to the diagnosis of lung cancer. Soc Sci Med doi
  17. (2009). Health. Cancer reform strategy, 2nd annual report. London: Department of Health,
  18. (2010). Health. National cancer equality initiative report. London: Department of Health, doi
  19. (2000). Health. Referral guidelines for suspected cancers. London: Department of Health,
  20. (2000). Health. The cancer plan. London: Department of Health,
  21. (2009). Help seeking for cancer symptoms: a review of literature. Oncol Nurs Forum doi
  22. Improving early presentation of cancer symptoms in disadvantaged communities: putting local people in control.
  23. (1991). Influence of “diagnostic delay” upon cancer survival: an analysis of five tumour sites. doi
  24. (2008). Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
  25. Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review.
  26. (2005). Is late diagnosis of lung cancer inevitable? Interview study of patients’ recollections of symptoms before diagnosis. Thorax doi
  27. (1995). Naming and framing: the social construction of diagnosis and illness. doi
  28. (2005). Patients’ help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet doi
  29. Public awareness of cancer in Britain: a population-based survey.
  30. (1996). Public health research and lay knowledge. Soc Sci Med doi
  31. Risk factors for delayed presentation and referral of symptomatic cancer: evidence for common cancers.
  32. (1998). Sacks: Social science and conversation analysis. doi
  33. shame and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. doi
  34. (1981). Sickness and the sickness career: some implications. In: doi
  35. Social variations in access to hospital care for patients with colorectal, breast and lung cancer between 1999 and 2006: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics. doi
  36. (2003). Stage at diagnosis is a key explanation of differences in breast cancer survival across Europe. doi
  37. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, doi
  38. (2007). Survival for eight major cancers and all cancers combined for European adults diagnosed in 1995e1999: results of the EUROCARE 4 study. Lancet Oncol doi
  39. (2002). Symptom to diagnosis interval and survival in cancers of the digestive tract. Digest Dis Sci
  40. (2006). Systematic review of factors influencing patient and practitioner delay in diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancer.
  41. The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients.
  42. (1998). The diagnostic process and the boundaries of normality. Qual Health Res doi
  43. (2007). The Healthy Communities Collaborative: new partnerships to tackle inequalities. Improvement Foundation
  44. (1981). The meaning of symptoms: a cultural hermeneutic model for clinical practice. In: doi
  45. The national awareness and early diagnosis initiative in England: assembling the evidence.
  46. (2010). The structure of patients’ presenting concerns: the completion relevance of current symptoms. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:481e93. Corner
  47. (1981). Theoretical perspectives in epidemiologyda critical appraisal.
  48. (2008). Time spans from first symptoms to treatment in patients with lung cancerdthe influence of symptoms and demographic characteristics. Acta Oncol doi
  49. Treatment decisions: negotiations between doctors and patients in acute care encounters. doi
  50. (2004). Trinkaus KM. Psychological factors related to delay in consultation for cancer symptoms. Psycho-oncol doi
  51. (2007). Understanding the process of patient participation.
  52. (2005). Understanding why women delay in seeking for help for breast symptoms. doi
  53. (2004). Views of health in the lay sector: a complilation and review of how individuals think about health. Health doi
  54. (1998). Who and what influences delay among women reporting symptoms of breast cancer?

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.