Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Which Works Better?

By Rafael Lalive and Armin Schmutzler

Abstract

Public agencies rely on two key modes to procure goods and services: auctions and direct negotiations. The relative advantages of these two modes are still imperfectly understood. This paper therefore studies public procurement of regional passenger railway services in Germany, where regional agencies can use auctions andnegotiations toprocure regional passenger rail services. This offers theuniqueopportunityto assess thetwoprocurementmodeswithinthesame institutionalandlegal framework. Wefirstcharacterize the decisions of the agency in asimple reducedform framework ofnegotiations and auctions. This analysis suggests accounting for the endogeneity of the choice of procurement mode by estimating the mode of procurement, quantity and price simultaneously. We then test this framework using information on lines that were auctioned and lines that were directly negotiated with the former monopolist. Results indicate (i) endogeneity of procurement choice can be fully characterized by observed line characteristics; (ii) frequency of service is 16 percent higher on lines that were auctioned compared to lines that were negotiated, and (iii) the procurement price is 25 percent lower on auctioned lines than on those with direct negotiations. Taken together, these results indicate a significant efficiency enhancing effect of auctions

Topics: Auctions, negotiations, liberalization, passenger railways, public procurement JEL Classification, D43, D44, R48
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.352.9754
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.