Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Virtual Screening for HIV Protease Inhibitors: A Comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina

By Max W. Chang, Christian Ayeni, Sebastian Breuer and Bruce E. Torbett

Abstract

Background: The AutoDock family of software has been widely used in protein-ligand docking research. This study compares AutoDock 4 and AutoDock Vina in the context of virtual screening by using these programs to select compounds active against HIV protease. Methodology/Principal Findings: Both programs were used to rank the members of two chemical libraries, each containing experimentally verified binders to HIV protease. In the case of the NCI Diversity Set II, both AutoDock 4 and Vina were able to select active compounds significantly better than random (AUC = 0.69 and 0.68, respectively; p,0.001). The binding energy predictions were highly correlated in this case, with r = 0.63 and i = 0.82. For a set of larger, more flexible compounds from the Directory of Universal Decoys, the binding energy predictions were not correlated, and only Vina was able to rank compounds significantly better than random. Conclusions/Significance: In ranking smaller molecules with few rotatable bonds, AutoDock 4 and Vina were equally capable, though both exhibited a size-related bias in scoring. However, as Vina executes more quickly and is able to mor

Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.352.724
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/v... (external link)
  • ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.