Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Towards a New Theory of Corporate Governance: Objectivity versus Proximity ∗



Objectivity versus Proximity In this paper we identify the trade-off between objectivity and proximity as fundamental to the corporate governance debate. We stress the value of objectivity that comes with distance (e.g., the market oriented U.S. system), and the value of better information that comes with proximity (e.g., the more intrusive Continental European model). Our key result is that the optimal arrangement between management and monitor (board or shareholders) should either capitalize on the better information that comes with proximity or seek to optimally exploit the objectivity that comes with distance. We argue that the asset structure, in particular, the irreversibility of investments, and the opportunity costs associated with resource misallocation critically determine the optimality of the distance- or proximity-based arrangement. We also discuss the ways in which investors have “contracted around ” the flaws in their own corporate governance systems, pointing at th

Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:CiteSeerX.psu:
Provided by: CiteSeerX
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)
  • Suggested articles

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.